1990
DOI: 10.1002/qre.4680060305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the field failure of passive and active components

Abstract: This paper briefly describes work that is in hand on establishing and running an organization for the collection and analysis of field failure data on passive and active components in electronic equipment. Data have now been collected from all the sources for nearly two and a half years as of June 1989 and the results obtained are presented. Analysis covers a wide range of electronic component categories.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The organization and some preliminary results have been discussed in several papers. [1][2][3] The detailed nature of the data collected has meant that as more data becomes available for each component type, it is possible to investigate the time dependent reliability behaviour of a range of electronic components based on field failure information. This method of presenting component behaviour examines the traditional constant failure rate assumption for electronic components as used in existing models for reliability p r e d i~t i o n .~-~…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organization and some preliminary results have been discussed in several papers. [1][2][3] The detailed nature of the data collected has meant that as more data becomes available for each component type, it is possible to investigate the time dependent reliability behaviour of a range of electronic components based on field failure information. This method of presenting component behaviour examines the traditional constant failure rate assumption for electronic components as used in existing models for reliability p r e d i~t i o n .~-~…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%