An Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Constructivist Approach in Teaching Business Statistics

Abstract

Aim/PurposeThe main aim of the research is to examine the performance of second language English speaking students enrolled in the Business Statistics course and to investigate the academic performance of students when taught under the constructivist and non-constructivist approaches in a classroom environment. BackgroundThere are different learning theories that are established based on how students learn. Each of these theories has its own benefits based on the different type of learners and context of the environment. The students in this research are new to the University environment and to a challenging technical course like Business Statistics. This research has been carried out to see the effectiveness of the constructivist approach in motivating and increasing the student engagement and their academic performance. Methodology A total of 1373 students were involved in the quasi-experiment method using Stratified Sampling Method from the year 2015 until 2016. ContributionTo consider curriculum adjustments for first year programs and implications for teacher education. FindingsThe t-test for unequal variances was used to understand the mean score. Results indicate students have high motivation level and achieve higher mean scores when they are taught using the constructivist teaching approach compared to the non-constructivist teaching approach. Recommendations for PractitionersTo consider the challenges faced by first year students and create a teaching approach that fits their needs. Recommendation for Researchers

Interactive Courseware: Untangle the Misconceptions in Cell Division

“…Various studies have shown that this learning approach is able to enhance students' mastery level, for example in teaching engineering subjects, arts subjects, and even science subjects (Lee & Zainal, 2018). Moreover, previous findings exhibited a significant improvement in students' achievement when Constructivism Theory in learning was applied, for instance, in teaching mathematics (Laz & Shafei, 2016), science and scientific thinking (Qarareh, 2016), as well as business statistics (Maheshwari & Thomas, 2017).…”

Untitled

“…This difference between online learning and e-learning as claimed by the above scholar has attracted scholarly attention from scholars. According to Nichols (2003) and Maheshwari and Thomas (2017), elearning invokes a meaning that revolves around having access to web-based technological infrastructure that can facilitate instruction (teaching and learning) in and outside the classroom while Oblinger, Oblinger and Lippincott (2005) write that online learning invokes "meaning which describes learning situation where learners learn outside the formal classroom setting usually by using online platforms. On their own, Basar et al (2021:121) write that online learning describes any forms of pedagogy delivered using digital technology.…”

English Teacher Participants’ Engagement in Online Learning Session of Teaching Profession Certification Program

“…In this context the learners would have opportunities to demonstrate their knowledge through creativity and collaboration (Dewey, 1933). Research reports have indicated how learners' engagement is considerably important in constructivist learning environment (Li & Guo, 2015;Dev, 2016;Vaughan, 2014;Maheshwari & Thomas, 2017;Kahn et. al., 2016).…”