1974
DOI: 10.1080/00050067408256525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the coopersmith self-esteem inventory: A discussion of two studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(1 reference statement)
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second measure of self-concept-the Coopersmith (1959) Self-Esteem' Inventory (SE1)-was administered to the sample in addition to the Sears (1964) Self-Concept Inventory (SCI), which was employed in the previous study. Australian research with 12 to 14 year olds, using the SEI found "negligible" sex differences (Edgar, Powell, Watkins, Moore & Zakharov, 1974). This finding is consistent with those of a survey of some 8,000 Sydney adolescents (Connell, Stroobant, Sinclair, Connell, & Rogers, 1975).…”
Section: Ian D Smith University Of Sydneysupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second measure of self-concept-the Coopersmith (1959) Self-Esteem' Inventory (SE1)-was administered to the sample in addition to the Sears (1964) Self-Concept Inventory (SCI), which was employed in the previous study. Australian research with 12 to 14 year olds, using the SEI found "negligible" sex differences (Edgar, Powell, Watkins, Moore & Zakharov, 1974). This finding is consistent with those of a survey of some 8,000 Sydney adolescents (Connell, Stroobant, Sinclair, Connell, & Rogers, 1975).…”
Section: Ian D Smith University Of Sydneysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It asks Ss whether they feel that certain statements, such as "I often wish I were someone else", are "like me" or "unlike me". This scale has been found to be suitable for use with Australian samples (Edgar et al, 1974;Ross, 1974).…”
Section: The Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is consistent with Brookover," Brookover and Thomas (1964), Calsyn (1973), Calsyn and Kenny (1977), Edgar, Powell, Watkins, Moore and Zakharov (1974), Hare (1975), Piers and Harris (1964), Winne, Marx and Taylor (1977), and Wylie (1974, pp. 180 and 326) as well as numerous others.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The SEI (Coopcrsmith, 1967) was selected because it was one of the most frequently used Selfconcept instruments in Australia at the start of this study and because it apparently measured separate peer/social, hornelparent and academic components in addition to the general-self scale (see Edgar, Powell, Watkins, Moore & Zakharov, 1974). However, Marsh and Smith (1981) subsequently found no support for the separation of the various subscalcs on the basis of factor analyses and multitrait-multimethod analyses (MTMM) and these conclusions are generally consistent with the Shavelson et al (1976) review of the instrument and with Coopersmith's (1967) own findings that led him to question the distinctiveness of the scales and to conclude that selfconapt (as measured by his instrument) was not multidimensional.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 99%