1984
DOI: 10.1029/jd089id06p09547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the annual cycle in upper stratospheric ozone

Abstract: The mid‐latitude upper stratospheric ozone profiles obtained by the solar backscatter ultraviolet instrument on the Nimbus 7 satellite show a clear annual cycle both in the absolute ozone amounts between 0.98 and 15.6 mbar and in the magnitude of disturbances that reveal themselves as longitudinal structure. At the lowest pressures analyzed a winter maximum in ozone exists, but as one progresses downward in altitude a shift in the temporal phase of the annual cycle occurs in the vicinity of 3 to 4 mbar. Compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, this necessitated putting more ozone into the middle stratosphere than is in the GFDL distribution. This adjustment actually brings the ozone distribution more into line with the recent satellite observations discussed by Frederick et al (1984). The zonal cross-sections of the final version ozone mass mixing ratios employed in this study are shown for each month in Fig.…”
Section: Ozone Distributionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, this necessitated putting more ozone into the middle stratosphere than is in the GFDL distribution. This adjustment actually brings the ozone distribution more into line with the recent satellite observations discussed by Frederick et al (1984). The zonal cross-sections of the final version ozone mass mixing ratios employed in this study are shown for each month in Fig.…”
Section: Ozone Distributionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Above 10mb the GFDL ozone mixing ratios are based on satellite observations, but are only available in the form of an annual mean (e.g., Fels et al, 1980). In the present study a meridional modulation of the GFDL ozone was introduced above 10mb to roughly account for the seasonal variation documented in satellite climatologies such as that of Frederick et al (1984).…”
Section: Ozone Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explorer (SME) results. The model deficiency has also been discussed by Frederick et al [1984] in terms of a previously unidentified source of odd oxygen. Allen and Delitsky [1991] reported that the ATMOS 03 data can be fitted if the currently recommended 02 absorption cross sections [DeMote et al, 1990] are increased by -40%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Douglass et al [ 1985] pointed out that advection can produce negative ozone-temperature correlations if the gradients of ozone and temperature are of opposite sign. This condition occurs in winter at stratospheric levels because of an ozone maximum at mid-to high latitudes produced by the greater sensitivity of the photodissociation of ozone compared to the photodissociation of molecular oxygen to variations in solar zenith angle [Cunnold et al, 1976;Frederick et al, 1984]. Because this level is close to the maximum zonal wind speed level and planetary waves that penetrate to this level tend to increase in amplitude with height, the advection term in this model again begins to increase above approximately 2 mbar.…”
Section: Sage II / Umkehr Layer-ozonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…altitudes [e.g.,Cunnold et al, 1980]. As a result, the seasonal cycle undergoes a change in phase[Diitsch, 1971[Diitsch, , 1979] from a summertime maximum in layer 6, which is chemically produced as discussed, for example, byFrederick et al [1984], to an early spring maximum in layer 4 resulting from the accumulation of ozone produced by downward motion over the course of the winter. For these reasons the horizontal gradient of ozone also reverses sign in this layer [e.g.,WMO, 1988].The more recent version[Hsu and Cunnold, 1992] of the three-dimensional dynamical-chemical model of Cunnold et al [1975] uses T18 truncation and two-dimensional distributions of NOx, Clx, and HOx to calculate the relatively small ozone variability between 31.3 and 15.6 mbar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%