2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of structural, spectroscopic, quantum chemical and in silico studies of ethyl 3-[(pyridin-2-yl)amino]propanoate: A potential thrombin inhibitor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the title compound, the optimized geometrical parameters (bond length (Å), bond angle (deg), dihedral angle (deg)) and their experimental counter values are listed in Table S1. For the title compound, the C–N bond lengths (DFT/X-ray diffraction (XRD)), namely, C11–N10 (1.37/1.349 Å) and C14–N2 (1.376/1.37 Å), are much shorter than the normal C–N bond length of 1.49 Å but significantly longer than a double bond (1.22 Å), suggesting that these bonds have some multiple bond character . At the N41 position, the C14–N41–C32 angle is decreased by 4.31°, while at the N2 position, the C15–N2–C14 angle is increased by 9.83°.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the title compound, the optimized geometrical parameters (bond length (Å), bond angle (deg), dihedral angle (deg)) and their experimental counter values are listed in Table S1. For the title compound, the C–N bond lengths (DFT/X-ray diffraction (XRD)), namely, C11–N10 (1.37/1.349 Å) and C14–N2 (1.376/1.37 Å), are much shorter than the normal C–N bond length of 1.49 Å but significantly longer than a double bond (1.22 Å), suggesting that these bonds have some multiple bond character . At the N41 position, the C14–N41–C32 angle is decreased by 4.31°, while at the N2 position, the C15–N2–C14 angle is increased by 9.83°.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%