An analysis of migration and implications for health in government policy of South Africa

Abstract

For over a decade, the global health community has advanced policy engagement with migration and health, as reflected in multiple global-led initiatives. These initiatives have called on governments to provide universal health coverage to all people, regardless of their migratory and/or legal status. South Africa is a middle-income country that experiences high levels of cross-border and internal migration, with the right to health enshrined in its Constitution. A National Health Insurance Bill also commits the South African public health system to universal health coverage, including for migrant and mobile groups. We conducted a study of government policy documents (from the health sector and other sectors) that in our view should be relevant to issues of migration and health, at national and subnational levels in South Africa. We did so to explore how migration is framed by key government decision makers, and to understand whether positions present in the documents support a migrant-aware and migrant-inclusive approach, in line with South Africa’s policy commitments. This study was conducted between 2019 and 2021, and included analysis of 227 documents, from 2002–2019. Fewer than half the documents identified (101) engaged directly with migration as an issue, indicating a lack of prioritisation in the policy discourse. Across these documents, we found that the language or discourse across government levels and sectors focused mainly on the potential negative aspects of migration, including in policies that explicitly refer to health. The discourse often emphasised the prevalence of cross-border migration and diseases, the relationship between immigration and security risks, and the burden of migration on health systems and other government resources. These positions attribute blame to migrant groups, potentially fuelling nationalist and anti-migrant sentiment and largely obscuring the issue of internal mobility, all of which could also undermine the constructive engagement necessary to support effective responses to migration and health. We provide suggestions on how to advance engagement with issues of migration and health in order for South Africa and countries of a similar context in regard to migration to meet the goal of inclusion and equity for migrant and mobile groups.

“Emotional stress is more detrimental than the virus itself”: A qualitative study to understand HIV testing and pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among internal migrant men in South Africa

“…The on‐the‐ground reality of migrants’ challenges in accessing or even knowing about PrEP highlights the importance of addressing persistent community‐level barriers, such as using community health workers to help migrants navigate local health resources [ 82 , 83 ]. In addition, South Africa's policy discourse tends to focus on the potential negative implications of migration and often obscures the needs of internal migrants [ 84 ]. Shifting this discourse at the national and local levels may help to generate the necessary public will to effectively respond to migration and health.…”

The Effect of Human Capital, Economic Anxiety, And Political Ideologies on Immigrant Health Perceptions: a Between-Subjects Experimental Approach

“…The current literature on health stereotypes against immigrants has mainly focused on the general perceptions and attitudes of host populations towards immigrants (Appel, Weber, & Kronberger, 2015;Cabieses et al, 2024;Dias, Gama, Cargaleiro, & Martins, 2012;Dimitriadis & Ambrosini, 2023;Hacker et al, 2011;Manji et al, 2023;Pillai et al, 2023). However, it often overlooks the specific factors that influence these stereotypes.…”

Migrant men and HIV care engagement in Johannesburg, South Africa

“…Migrants also face other intersecting psychosocial and structural challenges which affect HIV and healthcare engagement, such as the disruption of relocation [ 22 ], lifestyle changes [ 5 ], unstable or lack of employment [ 21 ], isolation and difficult living conditions [ 25 ], lack of residency or citizenship documentation [ 28 ], and fear and language issues [ 29 ]. While some migrants nonetheless seek care in South Africa’s public healthcare system [ 30 ], research suggests that international migrants may also access healthcare at sites that are community-based or religiously-affiliated, especially where there are no fees or requirements for identity documentation or residence status [ 31 ]. For male migrants, challenges in seeking and accessing care are compounded by internal and social constructs of masculinity, which impede care engagement in healthcare settings felt to be oriented towards women’s needs [ 32 ].…”