2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2012.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of eco-efficiency in energy use and CO2 emissions in the Swedish service industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given our results in Figures 1 and 2, the total productivity change, technological change, and overall EC of bioenergy in the European Union experienced gains in productivity in the period studied. These outcomes are consistent with (Groot & Mulder, 2004; Edquist, 2011; Pardo‐Martínez, 2013). These were due to a significant shift in the best‐practice technology in the early 1990s and 2000s for the management of the bioenergy industry, which aligns with the primary objective of the industry to become one of the most relevant renewable energy sources in the EU energy transition.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Given our results in Figures 1 and 2, the total productivity change, technological change, and overall EC of bioenergy in the European Union experienced gains in productivity in the period studied. These outcomes are consistent with (Groot & Mulder, 2004; Edquist, 2011; Pardo‐Martínez, 2013). These were due to a significant shift in the best‐practice technology in the early 1990s and 2000s for the management of the bioenergy industry, which aligns with the primary objective of the industry to become one of the most relevant renewable energy sources in the EU energy transition.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It suggested that the difference between x * and x o and y * and y o pointed at the need for managerial improvement (Cooper et al , 2000). In this section, the authors evaluate how well economic variables are enhancing the profit efficiency of the bioenergy industry in the EU28 region following the models from prior studies (Martínez, 2013; Filippini et al , 2014; Filipović et al , 2015; Flues et al , 2015; Shi et al , 2017). The following equation (3) is based on a balanced panel data for observed countries EU28 ( i = 1,…, 28) during the period 1990–2013 ( t = 1,…,24): …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the contribution and the importance of the bioenergy industry to the development of RESs in the EU, profit efficiency being a function of engineering (technical capability) and managerial (allocative ability) aspects has not been evaluated in bioenergy efficiency analysis for the EU28 in total. Apart from Filippini et al (2014); Filipović et al (2015); Flues et al (2015), Alsaleh et al (2017); and Alsaleh and Abdul-Rahim (2018), several studies mainly focused on a country level (Barros, 2008; Thornley et al , 2009; Peura and Hyttinen, 2011;Martínez, 2013; Costa-Campi et al , 2015; Ferreira et al , 2017; Strzalka et al , 2017). This paper aims to present the analysis of the profit efficiency level of the bioenergy industry and its determinants for the EU28 countries in total.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%