2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.09.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of condensation errors in multi-group cross section generation for fine-mesh neutron transport calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many detailed treatments of this formulation are found in the literature. 4,9,20,43,46 This section gives an overview of the characteristic form of the steady-state Boltzmann neutron transport equation as used by MOCkingbird. Sections IV.A through IV.F start from the multigroup, isotropic scattering approximation and review the reduction to a problem that is discrete in both angle and space.…”
Section: Moc In Mockingbirdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many detailed treatments of this formulation are found in the literature. 4,9,20,43,46 This section gives an overview of the characteristic form of the steady-state Boltzmann neutron transport equation as used by MOCkingbird. Sections IV.A through IV.F start from the multigroup, isotropic scattering approximation and review the reduction to a problem that is discrete in both angle and space.…”
Section: Moc In Mockingbirdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphics processing units have also been used to parallelize MOC (Ref. 46), which hold their own parallelization challenges.…”
Section: Ive Parallelism and Domain Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the multi-group assumption, another assumption made is that a large and complex problem can be broken up into small constant cross section regions i [9], and that these regions have group dependent isotropic sources (fission + scattering), Q i,g . Anisotropic sources are also possible with MOC based methods [10], but are not used here for simplicity.…”
Section: Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are 35 made in the process of producing multi-group cross sections for core transport models. In order to avoid such simplifying assumptions, some researchers have recently employed direct full-core Monte Carlo calculations and massive cross section tallies to directly compute multi-40 group cross sections for downstream deterministic transport calculations [2,7]. Such approaches are feasible because Monte Carlo cross section tallies "converge" much more rapidly than local fluxes and power distributions and because cross section tallies can be agglomerated across 45 many spatial regions through use of sophisticated "clustering" or "machine-learning" algorithms [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of these methods for generating multigroup cross sections, including Monte Carlo, are capable of directly producing multi-group cross sections that preserve 50 local reaction rates and pin power distributions in 3D core transport models. Even formally "exact" multi-group cross sections lead to errors in downstream core models [2,3] unless additional "equivalence parameters" are introduced to force conservation of local reaction rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%