2021
DOI: 10.1080/00295450.2021.1871995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method of Characteristics for 3D, Full-Core Neutron Transport on Unstructured Mesh

Abstract: A myriad of nuclear reactor designs are currently being considered for next-generation power production. These designs utilize unique geometries and materials and can rely on multiphysics effects for safety and operation. This work develops a neutron transport tool, MOCkingbird, capable of three-dimensional (3D), full-core reactor simulation for previously intractable geometries. The solver is based on the method of characteristics, utilizing unstructured mesh for the geometric description. MOCkingbird is buil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous attempt at modeling the core with PARCS is reported in [6], but the neutron flux comparison with the Serpent solution was not successful, especially in the outer fuel lattice region, due to the mismatch between PARCS mesh and the actual CROCUS fuel lattices. Furthermore, in line with the current efforts towards the use of more flexible numerical methodologies to implement deterministic neutron transport solvers capable of operating on unstructured meshes [7,8], the Laboratory for Reactor Physics and System Behaviour (LRS-EPFL) has started to develop new tools for reactor analysis based on the OpenFOAM finite-volume library [9,10], namely: the GeN-Foam multiphysics solver [11] and the OFFBEAT fuel behavior tool [12]. In particular, GeN-Foam is a multiphysics solver for the analysis of nuclear reactors that takes advantage of general finite-volume methodologies on unstructured meshes to provide enough flexibility for the study of non-conventional reactor designs, such as CROCUS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A previous attempt at modeling the core with PARCS is reported in [6], but the neutron flux comparison with the Serpent solution was not successful, especially in the outer fuel lattice region, due to the mismatch between PARCS mesh and the actual CROCUS fuel lattices. Furthermore, in line with the current efforts towards the use of more flexible numerical methodologies to implement deterministic neutron transport solvers capable of operating on unstructured meshes [7,8], the Laboratory for Reactor Physics and System Behaviour (LRS-EPFL) has started to develop new tools for reactor analysis based on the OpenFOAM finite-volume library [9,10], namely: the GeN-Foam multiphysics solver [11] and the OFFBEAT fuel behavior tool [12]. In particular, GeN-Foam is a multiphysics solver for the analysis of nuclear reactors that takes advantage of general finite-volume methodologies on unstructured meshes to provide enough flexibility for the study of non-conventional reactor designs, such as CROCUS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…First and foremost, the assessment of new or existing NEAMS codes and capabilities is summarized in Section 2, providing a summary of the feedback and experience gathered through this work. This includes the use of Griffin for neutronics, BISON for thermo-mechanics, Sockeye for heat pipe modeling, SAM for 1D Fluid -3D solid modeling of coolant channels and system modeling of balance of plant components, SWIFT for hydrogen redistribution in hydride moderator, MOOSE Reactor Module and Mesh System for mesh generation [5], and the NEAMS Workbench for creating meshes or executing codes on the INL NCRC. The MOOSE MultiApp System was used in a wide range of multiphysics analyses on the HP-MR, GC-MR and KRUSTY models, for applications coupling of the Griffin, BISON, Sockeye or SAM, and SWIFT applications.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of sensitivity evaluation studies on MCNT calculations makes the researchers to perform their MCNT calculations neglecting mass errors due to mesh utilization, since the available works are related with deterministic methods [8,11,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%