2021
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.5657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative to proportional‐integral and proportional‐integral‐derivative regulators: Intelligent proportional‐derivative regulators

Abstract: This paper suggests to replace Proportional‐Integral and Proportional‐Integral‐Derivative regulators, which play a key rôle in control engineering, by intelligent Proportional‐Derivative feedback loops, or iPDs, which are derived from model‐free control. This standpoint is enhanced by a laboratory experiment.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work may include replacing the slope or the quadratic initial transient by an optimal control; improvement of the proposed model-free based control; implementation and comparison with the original Fliess-Join version of the model-free control, as it has been done, for example, for the glycemia control [11]. Stability issues regarding the closed loop are very important and a promising LMI framework dedicated to study the stability of optimization algorithms is also of interest [7,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future work may include replacing the slope or the quadratic initial transient by an optimal control; improvement of the proposed model-free based control; implementation and comparison with the original Fliess-Join version of the model-free control, as it has been done, for example, for the glycemia control [11]. Stability issues regarding the closed loop are very important and a promising LMI framework dedicated to study the stability of optimization algorithms is also of interest [7,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model-free control methodology, originally proposed by Fliess and Join in [10], has been designed to control a priori any "unknown" dynamical system in a "robust" manner, and is referred to as "a self-tuning regulator" in [1]. This control law can be considered as an alternative to PI and PID controllers [11] and the performances are really satisfactory taking into account that the control is calculated based only on the information provided by the controlled input and the measured output signal of the controlled systems. This control law has been extensively and successfully applied to control many nonlinear processes: see, e.g., [3,10,12] and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After first trials in Paris it has been quite often employed in many different places. Following [1], we are using here model-free control in the sense of [12,13] and, more precisely, intelligent proportional controllers. This setting, which has been successfully tested in many concrete situations, has already been illustrated via various questions about intelligent transportation systems (see, e.g., [4,7,17,30,31,36,40,41,42]).…”
Section: No Difficult Estimation Technique Implementing Any Control L...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the aforementioned TDE and UDE based control, the classical PD control and PID control, as well as the recent proposed intelligent PD (iPD) control and intelligent PID (iPID) control 36 have been also widely used for model free control, where the iPD control and iPID control can obtain exponential stability for trajectory tracking control since a disturbance observer was utilized to estimate the disturbance, which have been used in control of vehicle, 37 exoskeleton, 38 aerodynamic system 39 . But most existing studies did not consider the disturbance error and the finite‐time convergence cannot be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%