An Alternative Approach for Augmenting the Anterior Maxilla Using Autogenous Free Gingival Bone Graft for Implant Retained Prosthesis

Ribeiro, Cleide Gisele; Bittencourt, Thais Camargo; Ferreira, Cimara Fortes; Assis, Neuza Maria Souza Picorelli

doi:10.1563/aaid-joi-d-12-00016

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The anterior maxillary area required bone graft more than 77 %. Because of the high esthetic demands in the anterior maxilla, bone augmentation was performed even though there was no bone fenestration or dehiscence [ 11 – 13 ]. Autogenous bone graft in exposed threads of the implant was suggested as a golden standard [ 14 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery

Cha

Kim

Hwang

et al. 2016

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundImplant surgery has become popular with the advance of surgical techniques such as sinus lifting, guided bone regeneration, and block bone graft. However, there were no data about the frequency of bone graft during implant surgery. The purpose of this study was to report the frequency and types of bone graft depending on dental implant patients’ profile to complement the database regarding implant surgery.MethodsThe implant operations had been performed from January 2006 to October 2014. The upper and lower jaws were divided into six sextants. A total of 792 sextants were included in this study. Patient information including sex, age, sites, bone graft, and types of bone were investigated.ResultsA total of 1512 implants had been placed. Male and female sextants were 421 and 371, respectively (M:F = 1:0.88). Average age was 54.3 (ranging from 20 to 88 years old). Implants were placed in the posterior maxilla (322 sextants, 40.7 %), posterior mandible (286 sextants, 36.1 %), anterior maxilla (127 sextants, 16.1 %), and anterior mandible (57 sextants, 7.2 %). Bone graft was performed in 50.3 % of the sextants. Among the bone grafted sites, sinus lifting with lateral approach (22.1 %) and guided bone regeneration (22.7 %) were performed most frequently.ConclusionsBone graft in implant surgery was necessary to augment defects. More than half of the sextants needed bone graft for implant installation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery

Cha

Kim

Hwang

et al. 2016

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…12 In addition, 77% of bone augmentation is reportedly done for esthetic reasons, especially in dental implants applied in the anterior maxillary region. [13][14][15] In the present study, the osseointegration of titanium implants applied to the tibia of the rats, allowing bone healing after applying different graft materials to bone defects, as frequently used in clinical applications (HA, DPBB, AL, and CP), was evaluated by a biomechanical method.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomechanical Evaluation of Implant Osseointegration After Guided Bone Regeneration With Different Bone Grafts

Gunes

Gul

Dündar

et al. 2020

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical osseointegration of titanium implants after guided bone regeneration (GBR) with a hydroxyapatite graft, deproteinized bovine bone graft, human-derived allograft, and calcium sulfate bone graft. Thirty-two female Sprague Dawley rats were divided into four groups, each containing eight (n ¼ 8) rats: hydroxyapatide (HA), deproteinized bovine bone graft (DPBB), allograft (ALG), and calcium sulfate. Bone defects were created in the tibia of the rats, which were grafted with HA, DPBB, ALG, or CP bone grafts for the purpose of GBR. Ninety days after surgery, machine-surfaced titanium implants were inserted into the area where GBR had been undertaken. After 90 days of the surgical insertion of the implants, the rats were sacrificed, the implants with surrounding bone tissue were removed, and biomechanical osseointegration (N/cm) analysis was performed. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups in osseointegration (N/cm) three months after the GBR procedures (P > 0.05). According to the biomechanical results, none of the grafts used in this study was distinctly superior to any of the others.

show abstract

The utilization of vascularized pedicle combination epithelial‐sub epithelial tissue graft for socket preservation in the esthetic zone—A novel approach

Rezk

Rezk³

et al. 2019

Clinical Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The vascularized tunneled combine epithelialize‐subepithelialize connective tissue graft may yield biological outcomes superior to those achieved separately by rotated vascularization or combination interposition onlay tissue graft. This technique may provide clinicians with pathway to improve socket seal by improving the vascularity and the volume of the tissue seal, which would be paramount for the definitive esthetic and functional outcome for modern demand of our patients.

show abstract

An Alternative Approach for Augmenting the Anterior Maxilla Using Autogenous Free Gingival Bone Graft for Implant Retained Prosthesis

Cited by 6 publications

References 14 publications

Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery

Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery

Biomechanical Evaluation of Implant Osseointegration After Guided Bone Regeneration With Different Bone Grafts

The utilization of vascularized pedicle combination epithelial‐sub epithelial tissue graft for socket preservation in the esthetic zone—A novel approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About