2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative analytical method for determining arsenic species in rice by using ion chromatography and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous works, the four arsenic species were completely separated by conventional column (Lee et al 2019;Son et al 2019;Nam et al 2016). The lower resolving power of the capillary column used in this work could be attributed to its smaller inner diameter (0.4 mm) and particle size (4 μm) as compared to the conventional column (inner diameter = 4.6 mm and particle size = 10 μm).…”
Section: Speciation By Capillary Ion Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previous works, the four arsenic species were completely separated by conventional column (Lee et al 2019;Son et al 2019;Nam et al 2016). The lower resolving power of the capillary column used in this work could be attributed to its smaller inner diameter (0.4 mm) and particle size (4 μm) as compared to the conventional column (inner diameter = 4.6 mm and particle size = 10 μm).…”
Section: Speciation By Capillary Ion Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample loop volume for conventional chromatography column is generally more than 100-200 μL (Son et al 2019;Rosa et al 2019;Nogueira et al 2018). The amount of sample required for analysis using this sample loop is typically 0.5-1.0 mL or more.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many analytical methods available for monitoring metal ions, including atomic absorption spectrometry [14,15], inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [16], and anodic stripping voltammetry [17]. Compared with the above detection methods, fluorescence analysis has gradually become an effective tool in the field of analysis and detection, not only due to its advantages of high sensitivity, as well as low detection limit, but also owing to its visual recognition and low intracellular toxicity [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different analytical procedure used for arsenic determination of speciation/determination in water samples. A few of them only determination without speciation such as graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS) [8], Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (F-AAS) [9], hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry (HG-AAS) [10], capillary electrophoresis with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (CE-ICP) [11] and arsenic species can be determined with ion chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-MS) [12]. As low concentration of arsenic species in waters (sub ppb), sample preparation must be used before instrumental analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%