1964
DOI: 10.1109/tac.1964.1105700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternate approach to the fixed terminal point regulator problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 2 [7] . Consider the linear system (1) with (A, B) reachable, A control law 0 v minimizing the criteria (17) and driving system (1) to 0 F z t at 0 F t for an initial bounded condition z(0) is given by (with 0 …”
Section: Continuous Control Part Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2 [7] . Consider the linear system (1) with (A, B) reachable, A control law 0 v minimizing the criteria (17) and driving system (1) to 0 F z t at 0 F t for an initial bounded condition z(0) is given by (with 0 …”
Section: Continuous Control Part Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of open-loop controllers is that they do not produce asymptotic stability (and render the system unstable) if there is any uncertainty or disturbance in the system. A closed-loop continuous time optimal controller can be found in [55] which combines a continuous optimal state feedback with a time varying feedback that drives the trajectories to zero in finite time. This is a feedback form but any uncertainty or disturbances appearing in the system would render the trajectories only asymptotically stable and not finite time stable.…”
Section: B Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the optimal controller proposed in [55] is a good example of a state and time dependent finite time stable controller where it was shown that finite time stability holds for the nominal system under appropriate optimality conditions. For the case when disturbances are present, however, the optimal time-varying controller can only coincide with traditional LQR control at best as discussed in [55]. Hence, proving robustness of finite time stable controllers is a theoretical challenge for which various analysis methods outlined in the previous section can be employed.…”
Section: Robustness Guaranteesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After tj (t > tj) 8(t) will be removed. In this case, Uo will have two dynamics [25]: U = { -r™z(t)+rT8(t)fo rO:S;t:S;tj (24) o -rTMz(t) for t > tj.…”
Section: Initial Condition 8(0) Of 8(t) Is Selected In Order To Satismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+ Uo + U dis (25) In order to reject the perturbation 13 (.) for t > 0, U dis is synthesised using the integral sliding mode concept [29], [31].…”
Section: Initial Condition 8(0) Of 8(t) Is Selected In Order To Satismentioning
confidence: 99%