2014 13th International Workshop on Variable Structure Systems (VSS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/vss.2014.6881100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust finite time stability and stabilisation: A survey of continuous and discontinuous paradigms

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to provide a survey of the tools for analysis and synthesis of finite time stable controllers. The paper analyses the literature in continuous and discontinuous finite time stabilisation in a unified way covering both the fundamentals as well as the latest techniques available in this non-linear control paradigm. The contribution of the paper lies in its exposition of the robustness properties that continuous and discontinuous controllers guarantee. Some open problems are identified wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first set of simulation is conducted for the spacecraft dynamic (4), in which the disturbances and thruster faults are not considered. Figures 2 and 3 show the time responses of the attitude tracking errors q e and the angular velocity tracking errors e driven by the proposed FTC in (5), the proposed AFTC in (8), and the NTSMC in Reference 24. It is shown that all q e and e can converge to |q i | ≤ 2 × 10 −4 and | i | ≤ 2 × 10 −4 rad/s; however, the convergence time spent is different.…”
Section: Case a Comparison Without External Disturbances Or Thrustermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first set of simulation is conducted for the spacecraft dynamic (4), in which the disturbances and thruster faults are not considered. Figures 2 and 3 show the time responses of the attitude tracking errors q e and the angular velocity tracking errors e driven by the proposed FTC in (5), the proposed AFTC in (8), and the NTSMC in Reference 24. It is shown that all q e and e can converge to |q i | ≤ 2 × 10 −4 and | i | ≤ 2 × 10 −4 rad/s; however, the convergence time spent is different.…”
Section: Case a Comparison Without External Disturbances Or Thrustermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing attitude tracking controllers are asymptotically stable controllers. By contrast, finite‐time controllers can make the system states converge to an equilibrium point in finite time, which further provides faster convergence rate, better disturbance rejection, and higher precision performance . The finite‐time control methods can be broadly classified into two categories: the homogeneous method and the Lyapunov method .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Задача разработки финитных (гарантирующих выполнение всех переходных процессов на конечном интервале времени) алгоритмов управления с каждым годом становится все более актуальной, о чем свидетельствует рост числа публикаций по этой тематике (см., например, [1][2][3][4]). В работах [5,6] представлен алгоритм финитной стабилизации цепи последовательно соединенных интеграторов в условиях внешних возмущающих воздействий и параметрических неопределенностей системы.…”
Section: ключевые слова: оценка параметров регулятора финитная устойunclassified