“…Based on the low density of both the building blocks and the designed hierarchical nacreous structure, the nacreous bulk material achieved a striking trade-off among density, strength and toughness, which is hard to accomplish simultaneously for engineering structural materials and demonstrates impressive superiority compared with previously reported biomimetic bulk materials ( Figures 4 A and 4B) ( Bouville et al., 2014 ; Chen et al., 2018 ; Estili et al., 2012 ; Gao et al., 2017 ; Grossman et al., 2017 ; Guan et al., 2020a , 2020b ; Le Ferrand et al., 2015 ; Libanori et al., 2013 ; Liu et al., 2013 ; Mao et al., 2016 ; Morits et al., 2017 ; Munch et al., 2008 ; Naglieri et al., 2015 ; Nakagaito et al., 2005 ; Song et al., 2018 ; Yang et al., 2017 ; Zhao et al., 2016 ). As shown in Figure 4 C and Table S2 , the specific strength, (227 MPa/(Mg m −3 )) and specific toughness, (8.4 MPa m 1/2 /(Mg m −3 )) of our nacreous bulk material are both higher than those of the other bulk nacre-mimetics ( Bouville et al., 2014 ; Chen et al., 2018 ; Estili et al., 2012 ; Gao et al., 2017 ; Grossman et al., 2017 ; Guan et al., 2020a ; Le Ferrand et al., 2015 ; Libanori et al., 2013 ; Liu et al., 2013 ; Mao et al., 2016 ; Morits et al., 2017 ; Munch et al., 2008 ; Naglieri et al., 2015 ) ( Song et al., 2018 ). Notably, both the and of our nacreous bulk material are higher than those of nearly all biological structural materials and most engineering structural materials including high-performance ceramics, metallic alloys and even glass-fiber-reinforced polymers ( Figure 4 D and Table S2 ) ( Bouville et ...…”