2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An all-evidence species-level supertree for the palms (Arecaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
142
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
9
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crown nodes of each of the subfamilies differ between the SUPERSMART and earlier results, some being older and others younger than previous estimates (Supplementary Table S2 available on Dryad). We also compared our tree topology with a recently published palm phylogeny (Faurby et al 2016a), finding both similarities and differences (Supplementary Fig. S5 available on Dryad) that likely reflect differences in the underlying data and analytical steps between our studies.…”
Section: Empirical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The crown nodes of each of the subfamilies differ between the SUPERSMART and earlier results, some being older and others younger than previous estimates (Supplementary Table S2 available on Dryad). We also compared our tree topology with a recently published palm phylogeny (Faurby et al 2016a), finding both similarities and differences (Supplementary Fig. S5 available on Dryad) that likely reflect differences in the underlying data and analytical steps between our studies.…”
Section: Empirical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We used the species-level phylogeny for all palms (Faurby, Eiserhardt, Baker, & Svenning, 2016) based on the taxonomy from Govaerts, Dransfield, Zona, Hodel, and Henderson (2011), which includes 2,539 species. Analyses were performed either on a set of 100 randomly sampled palm phylogenetic trees available from Faurby et al (2016) or on a maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree.…”
Section: Phylogenetic and Habitat Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the species-level phylogeny for all palms (Faurby, Eiserhardt, Baker, & Svenning, 2016) based on the taxonomy from Govaerts, Dransfield, Zona, Hodel, and Henderson (2011), which includes 2,539 species. Analyses were performed either on a set of 100 randomly sampled palm phylogenetic trees available from Faurby et al (2016) or on a maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree. The MCC tree was calculated from 1,000 phylogenies from the posterior distribution of trees available from Faurby et al (2016) using the "phangorn" package (Schliep, 2011) in the R statistical platform (R Development Core Team, 2016).…”
Section: Phylogenetic and Habitat Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following standard practice, we assumed three values of relative 121 6 extinction ε of 0.0, 0.5 and 0.9 when estimating diversification (Magallon and Sanderson 122 2001 We also repeated our diversification analysis as above with two large clades that were 125 well sampled at a species-level in separate time-calibrated phylogenies. These clades 126 included 70% of all 651 accepted Pinales (extant conifers) (Leslie et al 2012) and all 2,539 127 Arecaceae (palms) (Faurby et al 2016). We intersected risk statuses of the two clades with 128 species stem ages, giving n = 433 and 547, respectively.…”
Section: Methods 95mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We intersected risk statuses of the two clades with 128 species stem ages, giving n = 433 and 547, respectively. For the palms, we used the 129 maximum clade credibility tree that we computed from the posterior distribution of trees that 130 was generated using topological constraints based on Govaerts taxonomy recommended in 131 Faurby et al (2016). 132…”
Section: Methods 95mentioning
confidence: 99%