Niche conservatism drives a global discrepancy in palm species richness between seasonally dry and moist habitats

Abstract

Aim Rapid global environmental change predicts increasingly seasonal climate in the tropics, causing expansion of seasonally dry habitats and leading to shifts in species distribution and potential extinction. Here, we use a macroevolutionary framework to understand the processes driving palm diversity patterns between moist and seasonally dry tropical habitats. We hypothesize that the discrepancy in species richness between habitats is explained by higher speciation rates in moist habitat and that niche conservatism prevents frequent shifts between habitats. Location Global. Time period Last 100 Ma. Major taxa studied Arecaceae. Methods We used trait‐dependent diversification models to test whether different habitats affect palm speciation rates. Furthermore, palm assemblages were divided into three regions (Africa, Australasia and Neotropics) to test for niche conservatism and evaluate phylogenetic dissimilarity. Results We found no relationship between speciation rate and habitat type. We detected phylogenetic signal for habitats at both global and continental scales, indicating that closely related species were more similar than expected by chance. Colonization of seasonally dry habitats occurred c. 60 Ma, yet most clades only diversified after c. 30 Ma. The high phylogenetic dissimilarity between habitat types at both global and continental scales was driven by high lineage turnover, at least for Africa and the Neotropics. Main conclusions We found a lack of differential speciation rates in setting the seasonally dry and moist palm‐richness discrepancy. However, over evolutionary history most palm lineages fail to colonize seasonally dry habitats owing to a tendency to retain ancestral habitat. Indeed, seasonally dry palm assemblages are the result of the diversification of particular lineages. Likewise, long‐term dry periods appear to induce shifts in taxonomic and functional diversity, and we emphasize that the expansion of dry habitats might also imply a loss of palm clades, hence a reduction in phylogenetic diversity.

Geographic patterns and environmental correlates of taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity for large‐scale angiosperm assemblages in China

“…Phylogenetic β‐diversity (PBD hereafter) can also be partitioned into two components accounting for ‘true’ phylogenetic turnover and phylogenetic diversity gradients (Leprieur et al 2012). Examining TBD and PBD simultaneously can provide insights into both contemporary ecological and historical evolutionary mechanisms shaping variation in species diversity and composition among local and regional assemblages (Graham and Fine 2008, Peixoto et al 2017, Cássia‐Silva et al 2019).…”

Taxonomic and phylogenetic β‐diversity of freshwater fish assemblages in relationship to geographical and climatic determinants in North America

“…The simultaneous examination of taxonomic and phylogenetic β‐diversity can provide insights into both contemporary ecological and historical evolutionary mechanisms shaping variation in species diversity and composition among biological assemblages (Cassia‐Silva et al, 2019; Graham & Fine, 2008; Qian, Jin, et al., 2020; Peixoto et al., 2017). Analogous to taxonomic β‐diversity, which measures change in species composition across space, PBD measures the extent to which assemblages differ in terms of the evolutionary relationships of their members (Graham & Fine, 2008).…”

Transitions between biomes are common and directional in Bombacoideae (Malvaceae)

“…This could reflect that rainfall seasonality is a major determinant of the floristic composition of tropical forests (e.g. Morley, ), and dry climate is an important phylogenetic constraint to plant evolution for many lineages (Cássia‐Silva, Freitas, Alves, Bacon, & Collevatti, ; Olmstead, ; Qian, Jin, & Ricklefs, ). However, transitions from evergreen rain forest to seasonally dry biomes, especially savanna, are known from plant lineages in the Neotropics (Bacon, Moraes R., Jaramillo, & Antonelli, ; Lohmann, Bell, Calió, & Winkworth, ), Africa (Estrella, Forest, Wieringa, Fougère‐Danezan, & Bruneau, ; Monthe et al, ; Veranso‐Libalah, Kadereit, Stone, & Couvreur, ), and Australia (Crisp et al, ) and the floristic study of Dexter et al () suggests permeability of lowland tropical biomes globally.…”