2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2004.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An AHP-based methodology to rank critical success factors of executive information systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(93 reference statements)
4
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In more recent years, the tendency has been to focus studies more explicitly on success factors for specific categories of information system. For example, the success factors for CRM systems [Kim & Pan, 2006;King & Burgess, 2006]; ERP systems [Sonmers & Nelson, 2001;Plant & Willcocks, 2007;Wang et al, 2008]; executive information systems [Poon & Wagner, 2001;Salmeron & Herrero, 2005] and global systems [Angeles & Nath, 2007;Biehl, 2007] have all been previously studied. Despite the significant period over which success factor studies have been published, and the variation in the technologies studied, there is a surprisingly high degree of consistency in their findings.…”
Section: Success Factors For Systems Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent years, the tendency has been to focus studies more explicitly on success factors for specific categories of information system. For example, the success factors for CRM systems [Kim & Pan, 2006;King & Burgess, 2006]; ERP systems [Sonmers & Nelson, 2001;Plant & Willcocks, 2007;Wang et al, 2008]; executive information systems [Poon & Wagner, 2001;Salmeron & Herrero, 2005] and global systems [Angeles & Nath, 2007;Biehl, 2007] have all been previously studied. Despite the significant period over which success factor studies have been published, and the variation in the technologies studied, there is a surprisingly high degree of consistency in their findings.…”
Section: Success Factors For Systems Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 summarizes the critical success factors for BI system implementation which are mentioned in the literature. Define the problem clearly -avoid scope creep (Watson, Fuller & Ariyachandra, 2004) Identify user's specific issues and needssolve their problems (Watson et al, 2004) Understand the underlying data issues -BI is not just software (Olszak & Ziemba, 2006) Select the appropriate toolset -look for fast, easy, lightweight and low cost application (Salmeron & Herrero, 2005) Build for flexibility and responsivenessknow that users will require changes early on (Salmeron & Herrero, 2005) Leverage existing staff -eliminate solutions that require new staff and/or consultants (Wixom & Watson, 2001) Lead from the top -leverage your authority and executive buy-in (Wixom & Watson, 2001) Sources: (Eckerson, 2005;Imhof, 2004;Olszak & Ziemba, 2006;Salmeron & Herrero, 2005;Watson, Fuller, & Ariyachandra, 2004;Wise, 2007;Wixom & Watson, 2001) According to Williams and Williams (2007), common mistakes that are made while establishing and managing BI programs are:…”
Section: Critical Success Factors For Bimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, we can find several researches about EIS that analyse the success factors and the reasons why executives use EIS Nord & Nord, 1995;Salmeron & Herrero, 2005;Young & Watson, 1995). The study conducted…”
Section: Jl Cano Giner -V Fernandez -M Díaz Boladerasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, we can find several researches about EIS (Salmeron & Herrero, 2005;Young & Watson, 1995;Leidner, Carlsson, & Elam, 1995;Nord & Nord, 1995) that analyse the success factors and the reasons why executives use EIS. From another point of view, Pijpers, Bemelmans, Heemstra, and van Montfort (2001) review the use of EIS through the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989;Burton-Jones & Hubona, 2006), and propose that a small number of antecedent variables influence actual use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%