2020
DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An agenda for psychological distance apart from construal level

Abstract: Mental life is not confined to physical reality. Instead, anchored in the here and now, people can conjure worlds set in other locations, in other times, from other people's perspectives, and with otherworldly odds. These routes away from immediacy represent different dimensions of psychological distance—space, time, social distance, and probability—in that they all provide a means by which targets of consideration can feel psychologically distant. Though largely developed under the theoretical banner of const… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(95 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, regarding the construal level, recent research questions distance exchangeability. Although Sanchez et al (2021) found additional evidence of the link between construal and temporal distance, Calderon et al (2020, e27), after two failed replication attempts, “advise against treating likelihood as a psychological distance until further tests have established the relationship.” Consequently, and tying in with Maglio (2020), we suggest emphasizing each dimension's unique characteristics, and explicitly testing the claim of exchangeability between distance dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, regarding the construal level, recent research questions distance exchangeability. Although Sanchez et al (2021) found additional evidence of the link between construal and temporal distance, Calderon et al (2020, e27), after two failed replication attempts, “advise against treating likelihood as a psychological distance until further tests have established the relationship.” Consequently, and tying in with Maglio (2020), we suggest emphasizing each dimension's unique characteristics, and explicitly testing the claim of exchangeability between distance dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intrinsic limitation of our study is the variability of self-perception about COVID-19 risk and what it means to socially distance. People see and act in different ways, depending on whether those things are perceived as psychologically relatable [ 43 ]. Thus, people respond to social distancing recommendations according to their empirical constructs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swapping pictures for words can have just as strong an effect (Bryan & Hershfield, 2012;Chishima & Wilson, 2020) because both enhance emotional connections over time (Bartels & Rips, 2010;Ersner-Hershfield, Garton, Ballard, Samanez-Larkin, & Knutson, 2009). Uncertainty makes the future self feel not just socially remote but also as belonging to a future age (see Maglio & Kwok, 2016), as these different constructs conspire to push things farther and farther away (Maglio, 2020a(Maglio, , 2020bMaglio, Trope, & Liberman, 2013a). Although the intertemporal tradeoffs that impact cumulative future selves transpire over objective time (e.g., $20 today vs. $40 next week), people mentally convert from absolute time to a relative sense of closeness or distance in thinking across time (Hu & Maglio, 2018), including the making of choices between smaller payoffs sooner and larger payoffs later (Maglio, Trope, & Liberman, 2013b;Malkoc & Zauberman, 2019;Xu, González-Vallejo, & Vincent, 2020;Zauberman, Kim, Malkoc, & Bettman, 2009).…”
Section: Conflict Of Interest Nonementioning
confidence: 99%