“…Indeed, given the predominance of type I fibres in the lumbar paravertebral muscles (Kimura, 2002;Mannion et al, 1997;Ng et al, 1998;Parkkola et al, 1993a;Sirca and Kostevc, 1985) and that type I fibres tend to accumulate fat deposits with age (Choi et al, 2016;Gueugneau et al, 2015) whilst fast-twitch fibres typically exhibit greater atrophy with age (Gueugneau et al, 2015;Lexell et al, 1988;Novotny et al, 2015), it is unsurprising that fat infiltration was the more apparent degenerative feature in the lumbar musculature. Although the findings in this review can be explained by established mechanisms that contribute to the development and morphological expressions of age-related sarcopenia (Bougea et al, 2016;Doherty, 2003;Klitgaard et al, 1990;Larsson et al, 1979;Vettor et al, 2009;von Haehling et al, 2010), confidence in the findings is diminished somewhat by the substantial variance between studies. However, disparate methods and population characteristics amongst studies included in this review were able to explain a large proportion of variance and shed light on which factors play a pivotal role in moderating the agerelated changes in lumbar paravertebral muscle morphology.…”