2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.05.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adjustable Implant for the Nasal Valve: 3‐Year Experience

Abstract: Objective 1) Measure the effectiveness of the Monarch implant in correcting nasal valve dysfunction. 2) Determine the longevity of effectiveness. Methods This study consists of a prospective, cumulative, three-year experience with the Monarch adjustable nasal implant for correcting nasal valve dysfunction in a total of 46 patients. Implantation success was determined by the use of acoustic rhinomanometry and a subjective NOSE-type quality of life scale. Data was subjected to the student-t test. Results In the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, in both this study and Hurbis' studies, there were no to minimal side effects reported (11)(12)(13) . This combined evidence appears to favor the titanium butterfly implant over the cartilaginous graft as a superior procedure for nasal valve repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, in both this study and Hurbis' studies, there were no to minimal side effects reported (11)(12)(13) . This combined evidence appears to favor the titanium butterfly implant over the cartilaginous graft as a superior procedure for nasal valve repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The cartilaginous butterfly graft does, however, have some disadvantages including the loss of elasticity and strength over time, fullness of the cartilaginous nasal dorsum, and inability to adjust the graft later. In order to correct some of these limitations, Hurbis (11)(12)(13) developed a titanium-expanded polytetrafluoroethylene ( Due to these essential differences, along with the material, both procedures are difficult to compare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, Friedman et al ., in a large case series of 100 patients treated with butterfly grafts, presented encouraging results regarding an improvement in INV function and nasal aesthetics . As an alternative to cartilage butterfly grafts, titanium nasal implants have been recently introduced, having promising results regarding their effectiveness in the correction of INV dysfunction …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hurbis described a similar procedure using the Monarch Nasal Implant, made of either an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene or a silicone casing surrounding a titanium core. 28,29 Various other alternatives to using a cartilage graft have been described, including the use of grafts made of synthetic materials such as nonresorbable high-density porous polyethylene 9 and resorbable polymer of polyglycolic and polylactic acid. 10 The objective of this study is to evaluate patient-reported outcomes after placement of the titanium implants, in place of cartilage grafts alone, in nasal valve reconstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%