2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10882-018-9606-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Additive Analysis of Lag Schedules of Reinforcement and Rules on Novel Responses of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hanley and colleagues [ 78 ] used embedded reinforcement to influence preschool-aged children’s classroom activity preference. Several studies have reported lag schedules of reinforcement to increase the variety of play in classroom settings [ 79 , 80 , 81 ]. Various studies investigating the use of parent–child interaction therapy demonstrated a decrease in child problem behavior during play [ 82 , 83 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hanley and colleagues [ 78 ] used embedded reinforcement to influence preschool-aged children’s classroom activity preference. Several studies have reported lag schedules of reinforcement to increase the variety of play in classroom settings [ 79 , 80 , 81 ]. Various studies investigating the use of parent–child interaction therapy demonstrated a decrease in child problem behavior during play [ 82 , 83 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From our perspective, the decrease in the previous three instructional blocks could be understood as a decrease in the concreteness of behavior or, in other words, a less accurate way of giving instructions. These findings can also be explained through experimental analysis of behavior, as some experiments revealed that, while the accuracy of the instructions issued is essential at the beginning of the learning process for acquiring the response and to putting it into contact with the contingencies, the application of contingencies is more important for maintaining the response (Ayllon & Azrin, 1964;Baron & Galizio, 1983;Cerutti, 1994;Cronin et al, 2015;Galizio, 1979;Hayes et al, 1986;Hojo, 2002;Kaufman et al, 1966;Martínez & Ribes, 1996;Martínez et al, 2007;Martínez & Tamayo, 2005;Mazzullo et al, 1974;Morrison & Wizted, 1989;Okouchi, 1999;Ortiz et al, 2007;2008;Podlesnik & Chase, 2006;Radley et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few recent studies have further evaluated the effects of rules on response variability during individual instruction and found little to no effect of the rule (Radley, Dart, Helbig, & Schrieber, 2018;Wiskow et al, 2018). Radley et al (2018) compared the effects of a complete, accurate rule (i.e., contingency-specifying rule) to those of an incomplete rule (i.e., "Say something different.") in combination with a Lag 2 schedule on social skills variability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%