2013
DOI: 10.1615/intjmultcompeng.2013006012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive Domain Decomposition Preconditioner for Crack Propagation Problems Modeled by Xfem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practical XFEM realizations, the stress and strain are computed in a Cartesian coordinate system, so both quantities need to be transformed into a polar coordinate system shown in Equations (49) and (50). The transformation relation for displacements is given in Equation (41) and for stresses is given as:…”
Section: Numerical Formulation Of Irwin's Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical XFEM realizations, the stress and strain are computed in a Cartesian coordinate system, so both quantities need to be transformed into a polar coordinate system shown in Equations (49) and (50). The transformation relation for displacements is given in Equation (41) and for stresses is given as:…”
Section: Numerical Formulation Of Irwin's Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42]. Multigrid methods, either as iterative methods or as a preconditioners, have been studied in many application areas: for the Helmholtz equation when analyzing frequency responses of an structure [14], for plasticity problems [85] or recently in fracture mechanics with the XFEM method [83]. In contrast, direct solvers are not as popular as iterative solvers.…”
Section: Algebraic Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most applications, modeling the crack propagation at the scale of constituents up to the macroscale is, in general, not tractable. In the recent years, a few attempts have been devoted to multiscale modeling of damage from microscale crack propagation, including, among many others: FE 2 -approaches considering separated scales and microscale nonlinear damage, 1,2 extended FE 2 techniques with discontinuities at the macroscale, [3][4][5][6] domain decompositions methods embedding discontinuities, [7][8][9] or more recently methodologies enabling the identification of regularized damage models at the macroscale from microscale calculations. 10,11 In the mentioned works, only deterministic geometries and crack paths were considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%