A High‐order extended finite element method for extraction of mixed‐mode strain energy release rates in arbitrary crack settings based on Irwin's integral

Abstract

SUMMARYAn analytical formulation based on Irwin's integral and combined with the extended finite element method is proposed to extract mixed-mode components of strain energy release rates in linear elastic fracture mechanics. The proposed formulation extends our previous work to cracks in arbitrary orientations and is therefore suited for crack propagation problems. In essence, the approach employs high-order enrichment functions and evaluates Irwin's integral in closed form, once the linear system is solved and the algebraic degrees of freedom are determined.Several benchmark examples are investigated including off-center cracks, inclined cracks, and two crack growth problems. On all these problems, the method is shown to work well, giving accurate results. Moreover, because of its analytical nature, no special post-processing is required. Thus, we conclude that this method may provide a good and simple alternative to the popular J-integral method. In addition, it may circumvent some of the limitations of the J-integral in 3D modeling and in problems involving branching and coalescence of cracks.

Highly accurate solutions and Padé approximants of the stress intensity factors and T-stress for standard specimens

“…As evident from the tables, the Padé approximants are much closer to the converged values than the references. In some instances, the solutions of [3] may even lead to significant errors for standard engineering practice, see Tables 2,4,6,8,10 and 12. Figs.…”

“…Advancements to the FEM and BEM in recent literature, e.g. enriching shape functions by analytical asymptotic expressions, have lead to the extended FEM (XFEM) [6], the fractal FEM (FFEM) [7], and the extended BEM [8], and also meshless techniques like the element free Galerkin (EFG) [9] and Petrov-Galerkin [10]. The scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) is another numerical tool that has gained ample interest in the literature over the years.…”

XFEM modeling of short microfiber reinforced composites with cohesive interfaces

“…[20][21][22][23][24]), it does not readily account for the progressive debonding along the inclusion interfaces. Cohesive zone modeling, which requires the resolution of the interfaces, has been the traditional approach to idealize progressive debonding.…”

“…Pike, C. Oskay / Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 106 (2015)[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] …”

“…(22)-(27) is used for both the XFEM and the reference simulations. The characteristic length of 0.07 mm and parameters a and b of 49,000 and 19.5, respectively, were employed.…”