“…In the present study an AAA was defined as an aortic diameter larger than 2·5 cm, in keeping with previous publications 3,8,10,11,13 . However, others have argued that an aortic diameter smaller than 3·0 cm is normal, and unlikely to progress to clinically significant AAA formation 12,14 .…”
The appropriate rescreening interval can be determined by initial aortic diameter in screened 65-year-old men. AAAs of initial diameter 2.6-2.9 cm should be rescanned at 5 years, those of 3.0-3.4 cm at 3 years and those of 3.5-3.9 cm at 1 year.
“…In the present study an AAA was defined as an aortic diameter larger than 2·5 cm, in keeping with previous publications 3,8,10,11,13 . However, others have argued that an aortic diameter smaller than 3·0 cm is normal, and unlikely to progress to clinically significant AAA formation 12,14 .…”
The appropriate rescreening interval can be determined by initial aortic diameter in screened 65-year-old men. AAAs of initial diameter 2.6-2.9 cm should be rescanned at 5 years, those of 3.0-3.4 cm at 3 years and those of 3.5-3.9 cm at 1 year.
“…As age has been reported to be related to AAA, 19 the effect of age on plasma Hp levels in the 53 patients with the 2-2 phenotype was examined. There was no significant interaction between age and the occurrence of AAA (ie, the correlation between these variables was similar for both the AAA and non-AAA groups [data not shown]).…”
“…A detailed description of the protocol used in this study has been published elsewhere. 4 A total of 11 000 men aged over 50 were screened and 515 abdominal aortic aneurysms were detected. The analysis used first scan data for all men aged between 50 and 89, screened between 21 November 1991 and 6 January 1998.…”
Hypotheses are offered to explain this unexpected early peak in incidence. This information should allow the definition of the optimum age for screening, and the relative benefits of screening at different intervals if widespread screening is adopted in the future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.