The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80451-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme for all males over the age of 50 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study an AAA was defined as an aortic diameter larger than 2·5 cm, in keeping with previous publications 3,8,10,11,13 . However, others have argued that an aortic diameter smaller than 3·0 cm is normal, and unlikely to progress to clinically significant AAA formation 12,14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the present study an AAA was defined as an aortic diameter larger than 2·5 cm, in keeping with previous publications 3,8,10,11,13 . However, others have argued that an aortic diameter smaller than 3·0 cm is normal, and unlikely to progress to clinically significant AAA formation 12,14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…As age has been reported to be related to AAA, 19 the effect of age on plasma Hp levels in the 53 patients with the 2-2 phenotype was examined. There was no significant interaction between age and the occurrence of AAA (ie, the correlation between these variables was similar for both the AAA and non-AAA groups [data not shown]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the protocol used in this study has been published elsewhere. 4 A total of 11 000 men aged over 50 were screened and 515 abdominal aortic aneurysms were detected. The analysis used first scan data for all men aged between 50 and 89, screened between 21 November 1991 and 6 January 1998.…”
Section: Study Design and Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%