“…Compared to the brain, the spinal cord is a more challenging environment for fMRI (Bosma & Stroman, 2014; Cohen-Adad, 2017; Eippert, Kong, Jenkinson, et al, 2017; Giove et al, 2004; Kinany, Pirondini, Micera, et al, 2022) and the number of studies using this technique has increased only slowly at first. However, the continued development and improvement of scanner hardware (Cohen-Adad et al, 2011; Lopez-Rios et al, 2023; Topfer et al, 2016), image acquisition protocols for spinal cord fMRI (Barry et al, 2021; Finsterbusch et al, 2013; Kinany,et al, 2022), shimming procedures (Finsterbusch et al, 2012; Islam et al, 2019; Tsivaka et al, 2023), denoising strategies (Brooks et al, 2008; Kong et al, 2012; Vannesjo et al, 2019) and software tools tailored to preprocessing and analyzing spinal cord data (De Leener et al, 2017, 2018; Rangaprakash & Barry, 2022) have made spinal fMRI more robust, sensitive and accessible, and accordingly has met with growing numbers of spinal fMRI studies more recently (Kinany et al, 2022; Landelle et al, 2021; Powers et al, 2018; Tinnermann et al, 2021).…”