Quantitative spinal cord (SC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is fraught with challenges, among which is the lack of standardized imaging protocols. Here we present a prospectively harmonized quantitative MRI protocol, which we refer to as the spine generic protocol, for the three main 3T MRI vendors: GE, Philips and Siemens. The protocol provides valuable metrics for assessing SC macrostructural and microstructural integrity: T1-weighted and T2-weighted imaging for SC cross-sectional area (CSA) computation, multi-echo gradient echo for gray matter CSA, as well as magnetization transfer and diffusion weighted imaging for assessing white matter microstructure. The spine generic protocol was used to acquire data across 42 centers in 260 healthy subjects, as detailed in the companion paper [REF-DATA]. The spine generic protocol is open-access and its latest version can be found at: https://spinalcordmri.org/protocols. The protocol will serve as a valuable starting point for researchers and clinicians implementing new SC imaging initiatives. Note to the reviewer/editor/publisher: the companion paper is referred to as [REF-DATA]6/52 121 122dealing with cervical myelopathy and MS populations. Applications of the MethodThe proposed protocol is not geared towards a specific disease and it is suitable for imaging WM pathology (demyelination and Wallerian degeneration via axon/myelin-sensitive 122 https://mssociety.ca/about-ms-research/about-our-research-program/research-we-fund/canadian-prospect ive-cohort-study-to-understand-progression-in-ms-canproco 121 https://www.wingsforlife.com/us/research/imaging-spinal-cord-injury-and-assessing-its-predictive-value-th e-inspired-study-2675/ 9/52
PurposeInter‐scan motion causes differential receive field modulation between scans, leading to errors when they are combined to quantify MRI parameters. We present a robust and efficient method that accounts for inter‐scan motion by removing this modulation before parameter quantification.Theory and MethodsFive participants moved between two high‐resolution structural scans acquired with different flip angles. Before each high‐resolution scan, the effective relative sensitivity of the receive head coil was estimated by combining two rapid low‐resolution scans acquired receiving on each of the body and head coils. All data were co‐registered and sensitivity variations were removed from the high‐resolution scans by division with the effective relative sensitivity. R1 maps with and without this correction were calculated and compared against reference maps unaffected by inter‐scan motion.ResultsEven after coregistration, inter‐scan motion significantly biased the R1 maps, leading to spurious variation in R1 in brain tissue and deviations with respect to a no‐motion reference. The proposed correction scheme reduced the error to within the typical scan–rescan error observed in datasets unaffected by motion.ConclusionInter‐scan motion negatively impacts the accuracy and precision of R1 mapping. We present a validated correction method that accounts for position‐specific receive field modulation. Magn Reson Med 76:1478–1485, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The representations of the articulators involved in human speech production are organized somatotopically in primary motor cortex. The neural representation of the larynx, however, remains debated. Both a dorsal and a ventral larynx representation have been previously described. It is unknown, however, whether both representations are located in primary motor cortex. Here, we mapped the motor representations of the human larynx using functional magnetic resonance imaging and characterized the cortical microstructure underlying the activated regions. We isolated brain activity related to laryngeal activity during vocalization while controlling for breathing. We also mapped the articulators (the lips and tongue) and the hand area. We found two separate activations during vocalization—a dorsal and a ventral larynx representation. Structural and quantitative neuroimaging revealed that myelin content and cortical thickness underlying the dorsal, but not the ventral larynx representation, are similar to those of other primary motor representations. This finding confirms that the dorsal larynx representation is located in primary motor cortex and that the ventral one is not. We further speculate that the location of the ventral larynx representation is in premotor cortex, as seen in other primates. It remains unclear, however, whether and how these two representations differentially contribute to laryngeal motor control.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.