2009
DOI: 10.1021/jo900933r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphipathic β-Strand Mimics as Potential Membrane Disruptive Antibiotics

Abstract: In recent years, there have been increasing numbers of bacterial strains emerging that are resistant to the currently available antibiotics. In the search for new antibiotics, attention has been focused on natural antimicrobial peptides that act by selectively disrupting the membranes of bacterial cells, a mechanism that is thought to be nonconducive to the development of resistance. It is desirable to mimic the structures and activities of these peptides while introducing properties such as resistance to prot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49,55 Our fluorescence results show that N ε -trimethylation slightly decreased the magnitude of partition of the trimethylated peptides to DMPC:DMPG vesicles as compared to the magnitude of partition of the parental peptide and that a different threshold was found for these derivatives than for CA(1-7)M (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) 42 in this model membrane system, which may derive from the different partition constant of the peptides. In fact, CA(1-7)M(2-9) presents a higher partition constant; therefore, a lower peptide concentration is needed to achieve membrane saturation (1:12) as compared to case for the methylated derivatives (1:9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…49,55 Our fluorescence results show that N ε -trimethylation slightly decreased the magnitude of partition of the trimethylated peptides to DMPC:DMPG vesicles as compared to the magnitude of partition of the parental peptide and that a different threshold was found for these derivatives than for CA(1-7)M (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) 42 in this model membrane system, which may derive from the different partition constant of the peptides. In fact, CA(1-7)M(2-9) presents a higher partition constant; therefore, a lower peptide concentration is needed to achieve membrane saturation (1:12) as compared to case for the methylated derivatives (1:9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Thus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains (MRSA) have been reported with increasing frequency worldwide. 9 In this crisis scenario, with substantial effort devoted to the discovery of new antibiotic chemotherapeutic resources and strategies, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are receiving considerable attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have argued that the composition and structure of Gram‐negative and ‐positive cell walls is the basis for the susceptibility of different pathogens to AMPs, such as anionic phospholipids, the lipid A core of LPS of Gram‐negative bacteria and the teichoic and teichuronic acids of Gram‐positive bacteria . Once bound to a microbial surface, peptides cross capsular polysaccharides and other components of the cell wall before they interact with the cytoplasmic membrane in Gram‐positive bacteria . For Gram‐negative bacteria, the initial action of peptides involves the competitive displacement of LPS‐associated divalent cations, for example Mg 2+ and Ca 2+ .…”
Section: Antimicrobial Mechanism Of Antimicrobial Peptidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An explanation for this result might be the structural differences between the bacterial cell walls. AMPs competitively displace the divalent ions (Mg 2+ ) and calcium ions (Ca 2+ ) of the outer membrane by penetrating both the outer and cytoplasmic membranes in Gram-negative bacteria [44]. For Gram-positive bacteria, AMPs can cross peptidoglycan and other components before depolarization of the cytoplasmic membrane [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%