2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2021.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphibole control on copper systematics in arcs: Insights from the analysis of global datasets

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, magmas with larger concentrations of magmatic H 2 O are able to dissolve a larger amount of sulfur before reaching sulfide saturation and thus inhibiting sulfide formation (e.g., Fortin et al, 2015), amphibole fractionation would cause a decrease of the total Fe of the melt, like in the case of magnetite fractionation, converting soluble sulfate (S 6+ ) into less soluble sulfide (S 2− ) and thus promoting sulfide saturation (Carroll & Rutherford, 1988). In fact, a recent study has shown that extensive amphibole fractionation in andesitic rocks at temperatures below 1050°C, which is also the case here with the type-ii gabbroic enclaves of the NLF corresponding to a temperature range of 920-1044°C (Klaver et al, 2017), would substantially decrease the melt FeO tot content and thus also the sulfur content at sulfide saturation (Barber et al, 2021). Considered altogether deep forming "amphibole sponges" appear to be an important sink for sulfur and chalcophile elements in the continental crust.…”
Section: Amphibole Crystallization As a Trigger For Sulfide Saturationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Although, magmas with larger concentrations of magmatic H 2 O are able to dissolve a larger amount of sulfur before reaching sulfide saturation and thus inhibiting sulfide formation (e.g., Fortin et al, 2015), amphibole fractionation would cause a decrease of the total Fe of the melt, like in the case of magnetite fractionation, converting soluble sulfate (S 6+ ) into less soluble sulfide (S 2− ) and thus promoting sulfide saturation (Carroll & Rutherford, 1988). In fact, a recent study has shown that extensive amphibole fractionation in andesitic rocks at temperatures below 1050°C, which is also the case here with the type-ii gabbroic enclaves of the NLF corresponding to a temperature range of 920-1044°C (Klaver et al, 2017), would substantially decrease the melt FeO tot content and thus also the sulfur content at sulfide saturation (Barber et al, 2021). Considered altogether deep forming "amphibole sponges" appear to be an important sink for sulfur and chalcophile elements in the continental crust.…”
Section: Amphibole Crystallization As a Trigger For Sulfide Saturationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In addition to high V/Sc and Sr/Y, a striking feature of the chemistry of the Vanuatu Forearc magmas is their evolution during fractionation to extremely high Cu contents of ∼600 ppm compared to the other arc magmas (Figure 4c). For example, previous compilations using >13,000 analyses have shown that arc magmas rarely exceed Cu concentrations of >300 ppm during fractionation (Barber et al., 2021; Chiaradia, 2014). The behavior of Cu during magmatic processes is dominated by Cu‐loving sulfides (Jenner et al., 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic loss of Cu in intermediate magmas of increasingly thicker arcs could be the result of continuous iron depletion in this setting 56 due to fractionation not only of magnetite 7 and garnet 56 , as previously suggested, but also of abundant amphibole (Figs. 5 and 9a) as recently suggested by 57 : fractionation of all these minerals drive the evolution of thick arc magmas into the calc-alkaline eld. A dominant proportion of amphibole in the fractionating assemblage of thick arc magmas (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%