2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphetamine-Induced Fos is Reduced in Limbic Cortical Regions but not in the Caudate or Accumbens in a Genetic Model of NMDA Receptor Hypofunction

Abstract: A mouse strain has been developed that expresses low levels of the NR1 subunit of the NMDA receptor. These mice are a model of chronic developmental NMDA receptor hypofunction and may therefore have relevance to the hypothesized NMDA receptor hypofunction in schizophrenia. Many schizophrenia patients show exaggerated behavioral and neuronal responses to amphetamine compared to healthy subjects. Studies were designed to determine if the NR1-deficient mice would exhibit enhanced sensitivity to amphetamine. Effec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also suggest that the activation of the corticostriatal pathway is critical for the stimulatory effects of cocaine, as its ability to induce c-fos expression is diminished in mice with reduced NMDA receptor expression. Although dopamine-and amphetamine-stimulated c-fos expression in the striatum is also affected by NMDA receptor-mediated glutamatergic signaling from the frontal cortex (Konradi et al, 1996;Cenci and Björklund, 1993;Badiani et al, 1998), our results are in line with reports suggesting that amphetamine c-fos induction might be less sensitive to decreased NMDA receptor function (Dalia and Wallace, 1995;Morelli, 1997;Ganguly and Keefe, 2000;Miyamoto S et al, 2004).…”
Section: Biochemical Measures Of Postsynaptic Response To Psychostimusupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They also suggest that the activation of the corticostriatal pathway is critical for the stimulatory effects of cocaine, as its ability to induce c-fos expression is diminished in mice with reduced NMDA receptor expression. Although dopamine-and amphetamine-stimulated c-fos expression in the striatum is also affected by NMDA receptor-mediated glutamatergic signaling from the frontal cortex (Konradi et al, 1996;Cenci and Björklund, 1993;Badiani et al, 1998), our results are in line with reports suggesting that amphetamine c-fos induction might be less sensitive to decreased NMDA receptor function (Dalia and Wallace, 1995;Morelli, 1997;Ganguly and Keefe, 2000;Miyamoto S et al, 2004).…”
Section: Biochemical Measures Of Postsynaptic Response To Psychostimusupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Deletion of GluRε1 caused a reduction of locomotor stimulation in response to acute methamphetamine, as well as a lower magnitude of sensitization to repeated methamphetamine exposure (Miyamoto et al, 2004b). Mice carrying a hypomorphic allele of NR1 (the receptor subunit common to all NMDA-type heteromers) also exhibited decreased locomotion relative to WT mice in response to acute amphetamine, but interpretation of this result may be complicated by the increased stereotypy of this strain (Miyamoto et al, 2004a). Further, a mutant with an NR1 NMDA receptor subunit with reduced function that was expressed only in dopamine D1 receptor-containing cells, did not exhibit an alteration in amphetamine response (Heusner and Palmiter, 2005).…”
Section: Dopamine-related Genes: Amphetamine and Methamphetaminementioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 Furthermore, common antipsychotic medications are capable of affecting the positive symptoms of the disease 2 as a result of antagonistic or partially agonistic interactions with the dopamine D2 receptor, whereas dopamine agonists, such as amphetamines, provoke schizophrenia-like psychosis. 2,11,21 The dopamine receptor genes comprise a large superfamily that encodes G-protein-coupled receptors important for regulation of some higher functions, such as locomotion, cognition and emotions. [22][23][24] Five human dopamine receptors are described and classified into two major groups, dopamine 1-like (D1) and dopamine 2-like (D2), in accordance with their transcriptional and pharmacological properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%