2008
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic NMDA Receptor Deficiency Disrupts Acute and Chronic Effects of Cocaine but not Amphetamine

Abstract: NMDA receptor-mediated glutamate transmission is required for several forms of neuronal plasticity. Its role in the neuronal responses to addictive drugs is an ongoing subject of investigation. We report here that the acute locomotor-stimulating effect of cocaine is absent in NMDA receptor-deficient mice (NR1-KD). In contrast, their acute responses to amphetamine and to direct dopamine receptor agonists are not significantly altered. The striking attenuation of cocaine's acute effects is not likely explained b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(100 reference statements)
4
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of cocaine on dopamine accumulation depends on the firing of dopaminergic neurons, whereas the effects of amphetamine do not (41,42). Other KO mice strains, such as the NMDA receptor-deficient mice (NR1-KD), did not exhibit hyperactivity on acute cocaine administration (43) while their amphetamine response was not altered. Therefore, it is possible that the effects of cocaine on behavior are distinct from those of amphetamines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of cocaine on dopamine accumulation depends on the firing of dopaminergic neurons, whereas the effects of amphetamine do not (41,42). Other KO mice strains, such as the NMDA receptor-deficient mice (NR1-KD), did not exhibit hyperactivity on acute cocaine administration (43) while their amphetamine response was not altered. Therefore, it is possible that the effects of cocaine on behavior are distinct from those of amphetamines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2 A and B). Secondly, chronic amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization was examined as described previously (21) in D2GSK3β −/− and D1GSK3β −/− mice. Similar to the acute locomotor effects of amphetamine, D2GSK3β −/− (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locomotor sensitization was performed as described previously (21) and locomotor activity measured as described above. Details are described in SI Materials and Methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested the development of AMPH sensitization in these animals by monitoring their locomotion in activity chambers after AMPH (2.5 mg/kg) administration for 5 consecutive days. This dose is in the range used in AMPH sensitization paradigms in mice (21)(22)(23), and was chosen because it resulted in a robust acute locomotor response (4.4-fold increase compared with saline) across all control groups, as well as profound locomotor sensitization (4.8-fold increase in locomotion on AMPH treatment day 5 versus day 1) among all control groups. The long-term maintenance of a sensitized response was tested by challenge injections at 3 d of withdrawal (3 DW) and 21 DW (Fig.…”
Section: Nmdar Signaling In Dopamine Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%