Amounts of NO₃-N and NH₄-N in soil, from autumn to spring, under winter wheat and their relationship to soil type, sowing date, previous crop and N uptake at Rothamsted, Woburn and Saxmundham, 1979–85

Abstract

SummarySoil NO3-N and NH4-N were measured to 90 cm depth in autumn and again in spring, under several sets of winter wheat experiments, on contrasting sites. Crop samples were taken throughout the growing season, both before and after the fertilizer N was applied, to measure N uptake. The amount of NO3-N in soil at the outset of growth in autumn was related to the uptake of N by wheat not given any fertilizer N until April.The effect of sowing date (September v. October) on both crop and soil N was compared, as also was the effect of soil type (retentive of NO3-N v. readily leached) and previous crop (potatoes v. oats and wheat v. beans).The amounts of NO3-N in the soils in autumn related well with previous crop and declined gradually during winter on the heavier soils, but rapidly on the sandy soil, in the latter case as a consequence of leaching. On the heavier soils, where little leaching occurred, the decline in soil NO3-N related well with the amount of N taken up by September-sown wheat during autumn and winter, but not with that taken up by October-sown wheat, where NO3-N accumulated in the soil during winter, because uptake was so small. Hence delayed sowing enhanced the likelihood of losses of NO3-N by leaching or by denitrification. On the sandy soil at Woburn, whilst the September-sown wheat removed more N than the October-sown, losses of NO3-N by leaching were severe, so that late winter growth was restricted by shortage of N in soil, and the amount of N taken up was far smaller than at Rothamsted.The soil measurements distinguished between the NO3-N residues remaining after beans or wheat in the same field and between residues after oats or potatoes on soils of the same soil series, but in different fields on the same farm.The amount of NO3-N in soil and the N taken up by wheat in February-March were together used to adjust the amount of fertilizer N applied in April, using a balance sheet approach to meet a specific yield objective. Some of the N uptake data from these experiments are presented. This should aid the calculation of N requirement during specific growth periods and thus help improve the prediction of fertilizer N dressings in spring.

Response of Some Wheat Cultivars to Sowing Dates and Biofertilizers under North West Coast of Egypt

“…at that time (Ma et al, 2018). Generally, late sowing reduces N uptake and accumulation in wheat crops (Widdowson et al, 1987;Ehdaie & Waines, 2001). Sowing date plays a vital role in yield potential of wheat production.…”

Cover crops and organic amendments to prevent nitrate contamination under a wet climate

“…The former results from competition for soluble nitrate, which can be simultaneously leached and swept from soil. A number of grasses, crucifers and legumes have proved especially capable of recovering soluble and residual N from soil during autumn (Widdowson et al, 1987). Also, cover crops of non-legume plants have been found to control soluble N in soil roughly three times more efficiently than legumes.…”

Effects of Nitrogen and Plant Density on Growth, Yield and Chemical Composition of Two Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars

“…The Split dressings of nitrogen in intensive cereal nitrogen nutrition depends on N application, production mostly result in higher grain N recovery and on the N-fertility of the soil in yields. This effect can be attributed to more the root zone (WIDDOWSON et al 1987).…”