1968
DOI: 10.1126/science.159.3811.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amnesia: A Function of the Temporal Relation of Footshock to Electroconvulsive Shock

Abstract: When rats received a brief footshock upon stepping off an elevated platform, and an electroconvulsive shock 30 seconds or 6 hours afterward, amnesia was not observed 24 hours later. If a second footshock (noncontingent) was delivered 0.5 second before the electroconvulsive shock, amnesia was observed. The amnesia was temporary if conditioning was strong and permanent if conditioning was weak.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cue-dependent amnesia was reported in several subsequent studies across a range of paradigms and intervention types (e.g., Bregman, Nicholas, & Lewis, 1976;DeVietti & Holliday, 1972;Gerson & Hendersen, 1978;Judge & Quartermain, 1982;Lewis et al, 1972;Mactutus, Ferek, George, & Riccio, 1982;A. M. Schneider & Sherman, 1968).…”
Section: Reinstatement and Renewalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cue-dependent amnesia was reported in several subsequent studies across a range of paradigms and intervention types (e.g., Bregman, Nicholas, & Lewis, 1976;DeVietti & Holliday, 1972;Gerson & Hendersen, 1978;Judge & Quartermain, 1982;Lewis et al, 1972;Mactutus, Ferek, George, & Riccio, 1982;A. M. Schneider & Sherman, 1968).…”
Section: Reinstatement and Renewalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gerson and Hendersen's (1978) data suggest that NCFS is not effective, as ECS failed to induce RA unless the FS was presented in conjunction with the training cues. On the other hand, a second FS has been shown to extend the temporal gradient of ECS, suggesting RA for earlier acquisition (Schneider & Sherman, 1968). Furthermore, although they employed a somewhat atypical paradigm, Meyer and his colleagues (Howard, Glendenning, & Meyer, 1974;Robbins & Meyer, 1970) demonstrated that reexposure to a FS-escape contingency shortly prior to ECS results in suppression of memory for an earlier acquired discriminative shock-escape habit.…”
Section: Experiments Lamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Misanin, Miller, & Lewis, 1968;Schneider & Sherman, 1968). Demonstrations that amnesia can be produced for presumably wellconsolidated information are important because they suggest that the vulnerability to RA may be more closely related to the degree of activity, rather than the age, of memory (Lewis, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental assumption related to the hypothesis of synaptic consolidation, i.e., the unidirectionality, had been undermined by research that showed that the consolidated memories could incur a state of fragility, in which they would be subject again to manipulations that would change the probability of future retrieval (e.g., Misanin, Miller, & Lewis, 1968;Robbins, & Meyer, 1970;Schneider & Sherman, 1968). Such studies have shown that the retrieval or the reactivation of a memory followed another period of stabilization, and this aspect is the first set of demonstrations of an effect that would be called "reconsolidation".…”
Section: Genesis Of the Studies On Memory Reconsolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%