2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2018.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ammonia sorption outgassing and cross contamination ability of Entegris FOUPs evaluation and its volatile acids comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wafers were removed from the FOUP on day 7 promoting airborne VOC concentrations to drops drastically. Outgassing behavior of molecules such as HF, HCl, and ammonia was reported earlier [10] that report evidence of outgassing contaminants once the source is removed and the FOUP is purged; in this case the contamination source was removed but no purge was applied. The PGMEA & HBA behavior observed here, when eliminating the contamination source (wafer removal) demonstrates a significant decrease of the contaminant concentration at each monitored step until reaching a new equilibrium on day 14 th (312h), in which; neither of these two compounds reached background levels, confirming the tendency to adhere to the surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The wafers were removed from the FOUP on day 7 promoting airborne VOC concentrations to drops drastically. Outgassing behavior of molecules such as HF, HCl, and ammonia was reported earlier [10] that report evidence of outgassing contaminants once the source is removed and the FOUP is purged; in this case the contamination source was removed but no purge was applied. The PGMEA & HBA behavior observed here, when eliminating the contamination source (wafer removal) demonstrates a significant decrease of the contaminant concentration at each monitored step until reaching a new equilibrium on day 14 th (312h), in which; neither of these two compounds reached background levels, confirming the tendency to adhere to the surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Following their previous works on the sorption of volatile acids (HCl and HF) onto the polymeric surfaces of various FOUPs materials and the potential of their outgassing to cause cross-contamination, Gonzales-Aquirre et al ( 2019) 44 recently studied the characteristics of ammonia in the air. They chose to use a Cr-coated wafer for the sorption test, knowing that Si wafers are not sensitive to ammonia.…”
Section: Minimization Of Amcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cr-coated wafer now serves as a reliable test-vehicle to investigate the NH3 cross-contamination between FOUPs to wafers. Gonzalez et al [9] performed the experiments to evaluate the NH3 transferred on Cr-coated wafer from intentionally contaminated FOUPs (PC and EBMCNT) for an equivalent contamination occurrence of 1.5 ppmv (part-per-million-volume) of NH3 in FOUPs' atmosphere. After intentional contamination time of 24h, most of the initial concentration was sorbed by inner FOUP surfaces.…”
Section: Application Of the Modified-langmuir Adsorption Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to minimize the deposition of particles and AMCs, the front opening unified pods (FOUPs) were introduced as a controlled-minienvironment to protect the processed wafers during transport and storage steps. However, the FOUPs-walls are made of polymers, which potentially outgas previous sorbed-NH3 to the FOUPs' atmosphere, leading to NH3 cross-contamination on stored wafers [9]. The experiments of NH3 crosscontamination between polymeric FOUPs and wafers, however, require an appropriate metal-coated wafer 2 (named as test-vehicle) with a sensitive surface to the contaminant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%