Ammi Analysis and its Application to Sugarcane Regional Trials in Venezuela

Rea, Ramón; Sousa-Vieira, Orlando De; Ramón, Miguel Calvo; Alejos, Gleenys; Díaz, A.; Briceño, Rosaura

doi:10.1007/s12355-011-0070-8

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…5). Similar results obtained by Bissessur et al (2001), Jun et al (2009, Rea et al (2011), Tiawari et al (2011), Imtiaz et al (2013, Guddadamath et al (2014) and Rajesh and Sinha (2015).…”

Section: B4-brixsupporting

confidence: 84%

“…The other genotypes were unstable (S2di gave highly significant from zero). Similar results obtained by Bissessur et al (2001), , Jun et al (2009, Rea et al (2011), Tiawari et al (2011), Dutra et al (2014), Jun et al (2014, Rea et al (2015), Anand et al (2016) and Prema et al (2017). Klomsa et al (2013) noticed that the genotype K88-92 was the most superior genotype in cane yield.…”

Section: B3-cane Yieldsupporting

confidence: 81%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Performance and stability analysis of some sugarcane genotypes across different environments

Ali

Hassan

Mohamed

et al. 2020

SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eleven genotypes of sugarcane (ten genotypes and one commercial variety G.T.54-9 as a control) were evaluated at twelve environments; three locations (Agric. Res. Stations of Kom-Ombo, Aswan governorate, El-Mataana, Luxor governorate and Shandaweel, Sohag governorate and two harvesting dates; 11 and 12 month-old in 2015/2016 (plant-cane) and 2016/2017 (first-ratoon).The differences among genotypes, locations and between harvesting dates were significant for all studied traits; stalk length, stalk weight, cane yield, brix, sucrose and sugar yield. The interaction of locations × genotypes was highly significant in plant-cane and first-ratoon for all studied traits. Locations × harvesting dates interaction was significantly for stalk length in plant-cane crop and for stalk weight, sucrose and sugar yield in first-ratoon crop. Mean squares due to interaction between genotypes, harvesting dates and locations were significantly for all studied traits, except cane and sugar yields in plant-crop and stalk length in first-ratoon. Mean cane yield ranged from 54.23 and 52.61 to 57.61 and 56.71t/fed at harvesting dates and from 46.66 and 50.12 to 60.71 and 58.69 t/fed under locations in plant-cane and first-ratoon, respectively. Late harvesting date increased cane yield and its components. The stability analysis of variance for cane yield showed that the intermediate yielding genotypes (G.2003-47, G.2004-27 and G.2011-82) were more stable than the rather responsive high yielding ones. However, the genotype G. 2004-27 was stable for cane yield and its components. In addition, it was considered to be superior for cane yield under different environments. However, the highest yielding genotype (G.99-103) was unstable.

show abstract

“…5). Similar results obtained by Bissessur et al (2001), Jun et al (2009, Rea et al (2011), Tiawari et al (2011), Imtiaz et al (2013, Guddadamath et al (2014) and Rajesh and Sinha (2015).…”

Section: B4-brixsupporting

confidence: 84%

Section: B3-cane Yieldsupporting

confidence: 81%

Performance and stability analysis of some sugarcane genotypes across different environments

Ali

Hassan

Mohamed

et al. 2020

SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Among the most common methods are linear regression analysis, non-linear regression analysis, multivariate analysis and non-parametric statistics (Cornelius et al, 1996;Annicchiarico, 1997;Moreno-González et al, 2004). In recent years, the quantification of G × E interactions and yield stability studies involving sugarcane have been done through multivariate procedures, such as principal component analysis (Kumar et al, 2009;Guerra et al, 2009;Rea et al, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

AMMI analysis to evaluate the adaptability and phenotypic stability of sugarcane genotypes

Silveira

Kist

Paula

et al. 2013

Sci. agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) is one of the most important crops in Brazil. The high demand for sugarcane-derived products has stimulated the expansion of sugarcane cultivation in recent years, exploring different environments. The adaptability and the phenotypic stability of sugarcane genotypes in the Minas Gerais state, Brazil, were evaluated based on the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) method. We evaluated 15 genotypes (13 clones and two checks: RB867515 and RB72454) in nine environments. The average of two cuttings for the variable tons of pol per hectare (TPH) measure was used to discriminate genotypes.Besides the check RB867515 (20.44 t ha -1 ), the genotype RB987935 showed a high average TPH (20.71 t ha -1 ), general adaptability and phenotypic stability, and should be suitable for cultivation in the target region. The AMMI method allowed for easy visual identification of superior genotypes for each set of environments.

show abstract

“…Regarding specific adaptability, the positive interaction between the genotypes G10 and G11 with the environment E6 can be highlighted. Rea et al (2011) reported that i) vectors of the environment with angles smaller than 90° indicate environments with a similar influence on genotypes; ii) angles close to 90° indicate no correlation between the environments; and iii) angles close to 180° indicate a strong opposite relationship. However, as the objective of the study was to identify strong associations in the distinction of the genotypes, environments with angles of up to approximately 25° were considered similar.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implications of the clone by harvest interaction in the selection of sugarcane genotypes in a regionalized program

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. The recommendation of sugarcane clones depends on several factors, as the response or performance of the clones over different cuts or harvests. The clone by harvest interaction might be difficult to identify superior clones in the final stages of the sugarcane breeding program. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate and describe the implications of the genotype by harvest interaction in the adaptability and stability of genotypes and delineation of mega-environments from a set of multi-environment trials. Fifteen clones and four checks were evaluated in eight environments. The trait TPH (tons of pol per hectare) was evaluated in two harvests (plant cane and ratoon cane) in 2010 and 2011. The joint analysis showed significance for harvest (H), environment (E), and genotype (G) effects. The interactions GxE, ExH, GxH, and ExGxH were also significant. The last three-way interaction indicated the differential response of the genotypes over environments, and that it depends on the harvests. The overall mean of the trials was 12.77 TPH. The coefficient of variation was 8.70% and the selective accuracy was 98.63%, indicating high experimental precision. The genotypes G4, G14, and G16 were statistically superior to the check varieties used; however, these genotypes did not show high stability as described by the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction method. There was a specific adaptation between the E7 and E5 environments and the G4 and G5 genotypes, respectively. In general, the grouping of the environments was inconsistent throughout the harvests, except for the E1 and E4 environments, which exhibited similarities for the different genotypes.

show abstract

Ammi Analysis and its Application to Sugarcane Regional Trials in Venezuela

Cited by 10 publications

References 23 publications

Performance and stability analysis of some sugarcane genotypes across different environments

Performance and stability analysis of some sugarcane genotypes across different environments

AMMI analysis to evaluate the adaptability and phenotypic stability of sugarcane genotypes

Implications of the clone by harvest interaction in the selection of sugarcane genotypes in a regionalized program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About