1994
DOI: 10.1080/08120099408728109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amino acid racemization dating of a 140 000 year old tephra‐loess‐palaeosol sequence on the Mamaku Plateau near Rotorua, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative dating methods such as amino acid recemization (e.g., Kimber et al, 1994), obsidian hydration dating , and historical records where available have also been used .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative dating methods such as amino acid recemization (e.g., Kimber et al, 1994), obsidian hydration dating , and historical records where available have also been used .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest attempts to assign an age to the Rotoiti eruption utilised radiocarbon dating and were plagued by difficulties relating to the age limit for 14 C dating (generally considered to be ~40-50 ka) and contamination with younger carbon material (Froggatt and Lowe, 1990;Grant-Taylor and Rafter, 1971;Lowe and Hogg, 1995;Nairn and Kohn, 1973;Nathan, 1976;Pillans and Wright, 1992;Pullar, 1976;Pullar and Heine, 1971;Shane, 2000;Thompson, 1968a;Vucetich and Pullar, 1969;Whitehead and Ditchburn, 1994). For many years, Wilson et al's (1992) (Thompson, 1968b), 2 (Vucetich and Pullar, 1969), 3 (Pullar and Heine, 1971), 4 (Grant-Taylor and Rafter, 1971, 5 (Nairn and Kohn, 1973, 6 (Nathan, 1976), 7 (Pullar, 1976), 8 (Mcglone et al, 1984), 9 (Ota et al, 1989), 10 (Froggatt and Lowe, 1990), 11 (Buhay et al, 1992), 12 (Pillans and Wright, 1992), 13 (Wilson et al, 1992), 14 (Berryman, 1992), 15 (Berryman, 1993), 16 (Kimber et al, 1994), 17 (Whitehead and Ditchburn, 1994), 18 (Lowe and Hogg, 1995), 19 (Lian and Shane, 2000), 20 (Santos et al, 2001), 21 (Chappell, 2002), 22 (Charlier et al, 2003), 23 (Shane and Sandiford, 2003), 24 (Nilsson et al, 2011), 25 (Shane et al, 2006), 26 (Wilson et al, 2007), 27…”
Section: Previous Age Estimates For the Rotoiti Eruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggestion by Whitehead & Ditchburn (1994) that this age might actually be even younger because of the work of Bard et al ( 1990) on corals is a red herring, as it is not known whether such a correction applies (as noted by Whitehead & Ditchburn 1994 themselves). Kimber et al (1994) used amino acid racemisation (AAR) of loess, tephra, and paleosol materials to estimate the age of Rotoehu Ash at Tapapa (Mamaku Plateau). Their age of 61 ka (no error published) is in good agreement with that of Wilson et al (1992).…”
Section: Radiocarbon Agesmentioning
confidence: 99%