The Cambridge History of American Music 1998
DOI: 10.1017/chol9780521454292.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Indian musics, past and present

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparative musicology has established the existence of cultures where music traits remained essentially unchanged over extremely long periods of time, wide geographical areas, and different environments (ibid). For example, the comparison of recordings of Choctaw Indian music between 1909-1985 reveals that their social dance songs changed very little in their style, shape, and content-despite dramatic changes in the musical performance contexts (Levine, 1998). Similar findings are revealed by comparative analysis of Siberian field studies between the 1890's and modern day (Alekseyev & Nikolayeva 1981).…”
Section: Musical Development Generally Follows Verbal Developmentmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Comparative musicology has established the existence of cultures where music traits remained essentially unchanged over extremely long periods of time, wide geographical areas, and different environments (ibid). For example, the comparison of recordings of Choctaw Indian music between 1909-1985 reveals that their social dance songs changed very little in their style, shape, and content-despite dramatic changes in the musical performance contexts (Levine, 1998). Similar findings are revealed by comparative analysis of Siberian field studies between the 1890's and modern day (Alekseyev & Nikolayeva 1981).…”
Section: Musical Development Generally Follows Verbal Developmentmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The study presented here has adopted Densmore's own content descriptors, thus allowing to compare results of the computational analysis with Densmore's observations. Digital encoding of the Densmore collection [56] offers opportunities to complement Densmore's features by computational feature extraction [57] and sequential pattern mining [35], both to systematically analyse aspects occasionally mentioned in Densmore's narrative analyses but not captured in her features (e.g., linking melodic and duration features) and to add further music content descriptors (e.g., aspects of melodic contour or melodic motifs [20,58]). Computational features applied to symbolically encoded music data focus on structural features and generally do not reflect aspects of performance or context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Number Percent Melodic 3,4,5,8,9,12,13,14,15,16,18,19,22,23,24,25,28,31,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,42,43,44,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,58,59,60,61,62,64,65,66,67,72,73,76,78,80,81,83,84,85,…”
Section: Structure Serial Number Of Songsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…269 Though not formally an "Indianist," John Philip Sousa, famous for his marching band music, published a collection in which he applied harmonies to Native American melodies. 270 The musical influence was reciprocal. The performance patterns of Native Americans were also changed.…”
Section: Interlude Three: Americanizationmentioning
confidence: 99%