2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2011.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy after hysterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
207
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
207
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 compares the calculated doses with plan doses using examples of a vaginal cylinder HDR plan (37) . For 30 dose points in the VC plan, the dose difference was <3%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 compares the calculated doses with plan doses using examples of a vaginal cylinder HDR plan (37) . For 30 dose points in the VC plan, the dose difference was <3%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intracavitary brachytherapy is suitable for vaginal carcinomas invading a depth up to 0.5 cm whereas bulkier disease should be treated with interstitial brachytherapy 2. To avoid under‐dosing tumour, it is imperative that the applicator conforms to the vaginal mucosa without air gaps 1. Cylinders and ovoids, with standardised lengths and diameters, are commonly used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cylinders and ovoids, with standardised lengths and diameters, are commonly used. Cylinders are able to treat a greater length; however ovoids may achieve better mucosal contact in the presence of a widened vaginal apex 1. Multi‐channel cylinders offer a greater level of dosimetric control 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primary reason is that it is simple, convenient, and almost foolproof. Clinical data indicated that the HDR VCBT not only provides a large dose boost to an endometrial lesion, but also reduces the risk of recurrence in the vagina and causes significantly less toxicity than pelvic external‐beam radiation therapy 4 , 5 , 6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%