2011
DOI: 10.1515/iprg.2011.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American and Chinese complaints: Strategy use from a cross-cultural perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
2
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
60
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al 2011). The following are the speech acts that occurred with address forms in our data two or more times:…”
Section: Address Forms In Complaintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen et al 2011). The following are the speech acts that occurred with address forms in our data two or more times:…”
Section: Address Forms In Complaintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, statement of the problem/accusation, a common complaint speech act (cf. Chen et al 2011) has the highest incidence in Santiago (20.5%…”
Section: Address Forms In Complaintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chen (2011) focused on the strategies used in American and Chinese complaints from a cross-cultural perspective; Heinemann (2009) was interested in the participation and exclusion in third party complaints by looking at video -recorded data in Spanish and Selting (2012) looked into a corpus of audio and video recordings of German everyday private telephone conversations between friends in colloquial in order to find out the complaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affect display. Apparently, a study on complaints from CDA perspective using pragmatic frameworks is worth carrying out.…”
Section: Faculty Of Linguistics and Cultures Of English-speaking Counmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining structures of complaints above reviewed focus directly on the complaint itself, and the opening and closing is not explicitly shown. This is reasonable for studies employing written DCTs (Olshtain and Weinbach, 1987;Chen et al, 2011), since interaction is rarely observed (but see for example Martínez-Flor and Usó-Juan, (2010b) and Beltrán-Palanques (2013, 2016a who argue for the use of interactive written DCTs). This could be associated to the fact that the focus of those studies is to analyse speakers' complaint behaviour, rather than the overall conversation, which could include opening and closing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Por una parte, presenté una revisión de la literatura sobre el acto de habla de la queja (Brown y Levinson, 1978Olshtain y Weinbach, 1993;Trosborg, 1995) y de respuestas a quejas (Laforest, 2002), así como también de la estructura de la queja y de las distintas funciones discursivas que pueden emplearse para poder realizar tanto la queja como la respuesta a la queja (Laforest, 2002). Finalmente, se ofreció una revisión de la literatura de diversos estudios que se han llevado a cabo para analizar el acto de habla de la queja y de las respuestas a quejas (Olshtain y Weinbach, 1987;Piotrowska, 1987;DeCapua, 1989;Trenchs, 1994;Trosborg, 1995;Arent, 1996;Murphy y Neu, 1996;Laforest, 2002;Geluykens y Kraft, 2003;Tanck, 2004;Chen, Chen y Chang, 2011). En la segunda parte de este bloque se abordó la variable de nivel de lengua.…”
Section: Cabe Destacar También El Trabajo Laborioso De Grupos Indepenunclassified