2004
DOI: 10.1090/conm/363/06638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amenability and compact type for Hopf-von Neumann algebras from the homological point of view

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that in the setting of locally compact groups G, the above type of multiplicative structure on T (L 2 (G)) has been studied in [1,[39][40][41][42]. As defined in Section 3, the *-antiautomorphism R : B(L 2 (G)) → B(L 2 (G)) extends the unitary antipode R of G, mapping L ∞ (G) and L ∞ (Ĝ) onto L ∞ (G) and L ∞ (Ĝ ), respectively.…”
Section: Luc(g) and Ruc(g)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that in the setting of locally compact groups G, the above type of multiplicative structure on T (L 2 (G)) has been studied in [1,[39][40][41][42]. As defined in Section 3, the *-antiautomorphism R : B(L 2 (G)) → B(L 2 (G)) extends the unitary antipode R of G, mapping L ∞ (G) and L ∞ (Ĝ) onto L ∞ (G) and L ∞ (Ĝ ), respectively.…”
Section: Luc(g) and Ruc(g)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the span of the set {ω η : η ∈ L 2 (G)} is norm dense in T (L 2 (G)), it follows that (ω ξi ) is a right bounded approximate identity for T ⋆ (G). Conversely, if T ⋆ (G) has a right bounded approximate identity, then a similar argument to the proof of part (1) shows that G is co-amenable. Proposition 3.11.…”
Section: Convolution and Pointwise Products For Locally Compact Quantmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The relative biprojectivity of L 1 (G), that is, relative projectivity of L 1 (G) as an operator bimodule over itself, has been completely characterized: L 1 (G) is relatively C-biprojective if and only if L 1 (G) is relatively 1-biprojective if and only if G is a compact Kac algebra [2,20,12]. The corresponding characterization for (relative) C-biflatness remains an interesting open question.…”
Section: Proposition 52 Let G Be a Locally Compact Group Then L 1 mentioning
confidence: 99%