2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1026715032115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amelioration of NaCl Stress by Arginine in Rice Seedlings: Changes in Endogenous Polyamines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is suggested that not only a single metabolite, but an effective regulation and signalling of complex mechanisms was the main key reason to tolerant characters such as in barley and wheat [ 6 , 48 , 49 ]. However for ornithine, reports suggest that accumulation of ornithine can deduce more tolerant character for plants under abiotic stress [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is suggested that not only a single metabolite, but an effective regulation and signalling of complex mechanisms was the main key reason to tolerant characters such as in barley and wheat [ 6 , 48 , 49 ]. However for ornithine, reports suggest that accumulation of ornithine can deduce more tolerant character for plants under abiotic stress [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since polyamine concentration increase significantly upon exposure to saline stress, it has been proposed that polyamines could be a protective mechanism of plants against saline stress, therefore conferring tolerance against stress in some cases (Katiyar and Dubey 1990a;Bouchereau et al 1999;Reggiani et al 1994;Iqbal and Ashraf 2005). However, in other plant species polyamine concentration decreases as a consequence of saline stress (Kakkar et al 2000), and may even show increases and decreases in the same species, i.e. rice (Basu et al 1988;Krishnamurthy and Bhagwat 1989;Lin and Kao 1995) as is the case in putrescine (Put) concentration under saline conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been classified as a new group of growth substances and a type of plant growth regulator or hormonal second messenger (Galston and Kaur‐Sawhney 1990, Lee and Chu 1992, Tiburcio et al 1993, Gaspar et al 1997, Scoccianti et al 2000, Tassoni et al 2000). Extensive studies support the fact that they modulate a variety of physiological processes, such as stabilization of cell membranes (Schubert et al 1983, Roberts et al 1986, Kaur‐Sawhney and Applewhite 1993), stress response (Flores 1990, Aurisiano et al 1993, Das et al 1995, Galston et al 1997, Kakkar et al 2000), and senescence (Slocum et al 1984, Evans and Malmberg 1989, Rey et al 1994, Del Duca et al 2000). Their important role at the cellular level has justified extensive studies to clarify, at the molecular level, their function as modulators of cell viability or stimuli for cell proliferation (Igarashi and Kashiwagi 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%