1995
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199512000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambulatory blood pressure normality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 448 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,13,19 The study from the population of Monza 11 provided detailed information regarding BP measured by sphygmomanometric, home and ambulatory methods in 1438 subjects. However, levels of BP in apparently healthy subjects will vary between popu- hereditary and dietary factors, and the level of primary health care in the identification of patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases There were no differences in age but the males will be different in different populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,13,19 The study from the population of Monza 11 provided detailed information regarding BP measured by sphygmomanometric, home and ambulatory methods in 1438 subjects. However, levels of BP in apparently healthy subjects will vary between popu- hereditary and dietary factors, and the level of primary health care in the identification of patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases There were no differences in age but the males will be different in different populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a number of occasions, usually over a 3-6 month Although data on 24 h BP in normal subjects have period, using a standard protocol. Other factors been published from mainland Europe, [11][12][13][14] North taken into account are the presence of coexisting America, 15-17 Eire, 18 and Japan 19 we are not aware risk factors and/or presence of target organ damage, of any study performed in the UK. particularly left ventricular hypertrophy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 24 h mean systolic blood pressure below 125 mmHg and a 24 h mean diastolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg were considered normal accordingly to PAMELA Study (18)…”
Section: Blood Pressure and Vascular Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between values from these two measurement modalities is relatively low with reported coefficients of correlation around 0.5-0.7. [1][2][3] It is unsolved which measure is 'true', ie, which best reflects the 'usual' BP and prognosis. 4 The lack of identity between the two methods of measurement yields a group of patients with the combination of hypertensive office BP and normal ambulatory BP (ABP), which is generally referred to as 'white coat hypertension'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies make conversions for different gender and age groups separately, which makes the results less easy to handle in clinical practice. 2 Evidently, the varying cut-off levels give very large differences in the frequency of white coat hypertension, ie, 7-52%. [13][14][15][16] In the absence of large scale longitudinal studies and generally accepted cut-off values we have made the present analysis on BP and surrogate end-points with the purpose of examining the effect of different cut-off levels for the definition of normalcy and hence white coat hypertension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%