2014
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009708.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambroxol for women at risk of preterm birth for preventing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…General and respiratory health and the frequency of respiratory symptoms were worse among adults who had BPD in the neonatal period . In one study, the prevalence of childhood asthma was inversely related to gestational age at birth .…”
Section: System/organ‐specific Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…General and respiratory health and the frequency of respiratory symptoms were worse among adults who had BPD in the neonatal period . In one study, the prevalence of childhood asthma was inversely related to gestational age at birth .…”
Section: System/organ‐specific Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ambroxol also maintains the airway surface environment by modulating surfactant protein levels in the airways and increased mucociliary clearance ( 17 18 ). Based on these results, clinical trials with ambroxol to prevent or treat infant respiratory distress syndrome have been carried out ( 19 20 ). In a mouse model of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury, ambroxol treatment reduced lung inflammation and damage as well as cytokine levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, including IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β ( 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion was not consistent with a Cochrane systematic review showing insufficient evidence to support or refute the practice of giving ambroxol to women at risk of preterm birth. 95 Additionally, ambroxol is not even mentioned in relevant guidelines for the management of preterm birth. 7,89 Unlike this study and the previous systematic review, the authors included studies with repeated exposure to antenatal corticosteroids and due to the search date, relevant recent trials could not be included.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%