Ambient Temperature (20°F, 72°F and 95°F) Impact on Fuel and Energy Consumption for Several Conventional Vehicles, Hybrid and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Battery Electric Vehicle

Lohse-Busch, Henning; Duoba, Michael; Rask, Eric; Stutenberg, Kevin; Gowri, Vivek; Slezak, Lee; Anderson, David I.

doi:10.4271/2013-01-1462

Cited by 87 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This assumption is not necessarily restrictive as the model proposed below can be easily extended to accommodate both electric and regular vehicles. The fuel economy of BEVs is affected by factors such as ambient temperature (Lohse-Busch et al, 2013) and can often be perceived to be uncertain by drivers. Franke et al (2012) conducted a field study to analyze the lowest remaining battery state of charge that a user would experience comfortable.…”

Section: Basic Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Deploying public charging stations for electric vehicles on urban road networks

Yin

Zhou

2015

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

258

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Basic Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Deploying public charging stations for electric vehicles on urban road networks

Yin

Zhou

2015

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

258

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Haupt [6] investigates the thermal management for vehicles with an internal combustion engine, Hopp [7] analyzes the thermal management of a traction battery and Flieger [8] evaluates the modeling of the vehicle cabin. Some studies, e.g., Lenz [9] or Lohse-Busch [10], measure the temperature influence on the overall energy consumption of existing conventional and alternative vehicles. By doing so, the influence of static temperatures is analyzed, but no fuel cell based drivetrains are investigated and only a few starting temperatures are considered.…”

Section: Previous Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some studies, e.g., Lenz or Lohse‐Busch , measure the temperature influence on the overall energy consumption of existing conventional and alternative vehicles. By doing so, the influence of static temperatures is analyzed, but no fuel cell based drivetrains are investigated and only a few starting temperatures are considered.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Analysis of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs) under European Weather Conditions and Various Driving Behaviors

Hollweck

Moullion²,

Christ³

et al. 2018

Fuel Cells

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to the auxiliary loads' increasing influence on the overall energy consumption of electrified vehicles, a holistic tank‐to‐wheel analysis is necessary. To do so, the impact of the auxiliary load on the energy consumption of a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) drivetrain is investigated by taking different driving behaviors and three European environmental conditions (Spanish, German and Norwegian weather profiles) into account. The driving pattern is analyzed with the study ‘Mobilität in Deutschland' [1] and represented with the Artemis driving cycles [2]. To match various situations of the everyday life, realistic boundary conditions are determined by five starting times. The corresponding weather conditions are obtained and five weather profiles for every meteorological season including the ambient temperature, solar flux and humidity are considered. By using a complete FCEV simulation model, a realistic energy consumptions is simulated and the impact of different climate conditions as well as driving behaviors is investigated. As a result, a significant influence of the auxiliary load on the overall energy consumption is detected and the need to consider the overall energy demand is demonstrated.

show abstract

“…To address market-share-diminishing extreme temperature range issues for BEVs vs. seasonal temperature peaks [11][12][13] we compare results for warm, moderate and cold temperature regions. Theoretically, moderate temperature states should be most advantageous for BEVs because there would be minimal extreme temperature problems for the vehicles.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Assessment of Causes of PEV Success Across U.S. Metro Areas

Zhou

Santini

Rood

et al. 2016

WEVJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Short AbstractUsing 2014 U.S. light duty PEV registrations by make and model, this paper assesses the causes of Plug-in Electric Vehicle (PEV) success across U.S. states focusing on areas that had incentive and utility programs supporting PEV adoption. Market segments investigated were (1) luxury/performance (>$60,000 list price), (2) mid-market ($40-50,000), (3) mass market (<$40.000), and (4) total. States with either exclusive or preferential BEV incentives are a focus. BEV-biased incentives proved to be very effective in promoting mass market BEVs. After controlling for these attributes, case studies for several utility service areas were conducted to gauge whether PEVs were more or less successfully implemented via outreach by those utilities. These investigations suggest ways that utilities can successfully increase PEV registrations, after taking local climate and state incentives into consideration.

show abstract

Ambient Temperature (20°F, 72°F and 95°F) Impact on Fuel and Energy Consumption for Several Conventional Vehicles, Hybrid and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Battery Electric Vehicle

Cited by 87 publications

References 0 publications

Deploying public charging stations for electric vehicles on urban road networks

Deploying public charging stations for electric vehicles on urban road networks

Energy Analysis of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs) under European Weather Conditions and Various Driving Behaviors

An Assessment of Causes of PEV Success Across U.S. Metro Areas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About