“Always trying to walk a bit of a tightrope”: The role of social care staff in supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to develop and maintain loving relationships
Abstract:Accessible Summary
Support staff play an important role in helping people with learning disabilities to meet a partner and have a relationship.
Not getting good support can make it difficult for people to have a relationship.
Many support staff want to help people to have a relationship, but are worried about people being abused. This is especially true for those who do not have a lot of staff support.
Support staff do not always get good support themselves to help people with learning disabilities to have r… Show more
“…These findings indicate that despite considerable research and practice interventions in the interim decades, the reality is that people with intellectual disabilities remain disadvantaged in terms of health, (McVilly et al, 2006), employment;(Forrester-Jones, Gore & Melling, 2010) and romantic and platonic relationships (Bates et al, 2020). Emerging research also reports how needs assessments fail to translate into outcomes for people with intellectual disabilities and their carers Forrester-Jones (2021).…”
Context: UK austerity measures following the 2008 financial crisis included budget reductions for health and social care. We aimed to investigate the extent to which austerity-measures had impacted the lives of people with intellectual disabilities in England, and whether their support costs were associated with their characteristics, needs and outcomes. Objectives: We report on what services people with intellectual disabilities were using, whether they had lost care, the costs of their support, and what impact any loss of benefits and services had on individuals' lives. Methods: 150 participants with intellectual disabilities across England were interviewed about their services and their well-being. Service and individual support costs were calculated. Statistical and thematic analyses were employed. Results: The largest proportion (42%) of our sample had lost care. 14% had experienced changed care, and care had remained the same for 36%. Only 7% said their care had improved. No associations were found between costs and characteristics and needs except for whether the person had mild or severe intellectual disabilities. Those who had lost care engaged in fewer activities and had significantly lower self-esteem and quality-of-life scores compared with those who had not lost care. Loss of care impacted on individuals' independence and future aspirations. Limitations: A comparative study of austerity impacts across the whole of England was not possible. Our costs data may be underestimated because full information on support from home, key, or support workers was unavailable. Implications: In attempting to mitigate against COVID-19 impacts on people with intellectual disabilities, policy-decisions will need to consider the backlog of a decade of cuts.
“…These findings indicate that despite considerable research and practice interventions in the interim decades, the reality is that people with intellectual disabilities remain disadvantaged in terms of health, (McVilly et al, 2006), employment;(Forrester-Jones, Gore & Melling, 2010) and romantic and platonic relationships (Bates et al, 2020). Emerging research also reports how needs assessments fail to translate into outcomes for people with intellectual disabilities and their carers Forrester-Jones (2021).…”
Context: UK austerity measures following the 2008 financial crisis included budget reductions for health and social care. We aimed to investigate the extent to which austerity-measures had impacted the lives of people with intellectual disabilities in England, and whether their support costs were associated with their characteristics, needs and outcomes. Objectives: We report on what services people with intellectual disabilities were using, whether they had lost care, the costs of their support, and what impact any loss of benefits and services had on individuals' lives. Methods: 150 participants with intellectual disabilities across England were interviewed about their services and their well-being. Service and individual support costs were calculated. Statistical and thematic analyses were employed. Results: The largest proportion (42%) of our sample had lost care. 14% had experienced changed care, and care had remained the same for 36%. Only 7% said their care had improved. No associations were found between costs and characteristics and needs except for whether the person had mild or severe intellectual disabilities. Those who had lost care engaged in fewer activities and had significantly lower self-esteem and quality-of-life scores compared with those who had not lost care. Loss of care impacted on individuals' independence and future aspirations. Limitations: A comparative study of austerity impacts across the whole of England was not possible. Our costs data may be underestimated because full information on support from home, key, or support workers was unavailable. Implications: In attempting to mitigate against COVID-19 impacts on people with intellectual disabilities, policy-decisions will need to consider the backlog of a decade of cuts.
“…Heterogeneous attitudes were expressed toward the sexual needs and feelings of people with intellectual disabilities within five studies focusing on support staff [38,40,42,48,49], five on relatives [44,[50][51][52][53], and two studies that took the perspectives of both into account [47,54]. On the one hand, several support staff and relatives agreed that people with intellectual disabilities have the same sexual feelings, in the words of a relative "as the rest of us" [51, p. 285; 40, 47].…”
Section: Sexual Needs and Feelings Of People With Intellectual Disabi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attitudes toward intimate relationships of people with intellectual disabilities were found within eight studies based on the perspectives of support staff [43,48,49,55,[59][60][61]65], seven studies focused on relatives [44, 50-53, 62, 66], and one study addressing both groups [47]. Both support staff and relatives cited various reasons for why people with intellectual disabilities pursued intimate relations, namely: because they are supposed to; it is important; out of desire to kiss, hug, and/or engage in intercourse; and out of a desire to love and care for a partner [44,48,49,52,55]. Among both support staff and relatives, some shared the belief that relationships are frightening, and that the possibility of relationships provoked concerns around their vulnerability [43,44,46,48,49,53,65].…”
Section: Intimate Relationships Of People With Intellectual Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both support staff and relatives cited various reasons for why people with intellectual disabilities pursued intimate relations, namely: because they are supposed to; it is important; out of desire to kiss, hug, and/or engage in intercourse; and out of a desire to love and care for a partner [44,48,49,52,55]. Among both support staff and relatives, some shared the belief that relationships are frightening, and that the possibility of relationships provoked concerns around their vulnerability [43,44,46,48,49,53,65]. According to support staff, for men, this vulnerability primarily concerned the risk of becoming aggressive, whereas for women (unwanted) pregnancies was routinely emphasized [49].…”
Section: Intimate Relationships Of People With Intellectual Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to support staff, for men, this vulnerability primarily concerned the risk of becoming aggressive, whereas for women (unwanted) pregnancies was routinely emphasized [49]. Furthermore, in both Bates et al [48] and Abott and Howarth's [55] studies, some support staff viewed people with intellectual disabilities as desperately seeking relationships, which led them to be open toward any gender, or accepting an abusive relationship. Some relatives believed that it was inevitable that intimate relationships would occur, with some believing that marriage and children were future possibilities [50,53,61,66].…”
Section: Intimate Relationships Of People With Intellectual Disabilitiesmentioning
Support staff and relatives are uncertain about multiple aspects of the sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities. Given that their attitudes embody positive and negative views, they can respectively support and restrict free sexual expression among people with intellectual disabilities and their potential for (intimate) relationships. A qualitative systematic literature review was conducted on the attitudes of support staff and relatives toward the sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities. A systematic search strategy was deployed across seven databases. The identified articles were screened on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and assessed on quality, which resulted in 31 included studies. A metasynthesis of these studies resulted in two major themes emerging, namely (a) attitudes toward the sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities, and (b) attitudes toward the sex education and support. Themes represented both positive and restrictive attitudes among support staff and relatives. The findings suggest that despite a general acceptance of the sexual rights of people with intellectual disabilities, certain forms of sexuality were approached more cautiously. Moreover, the sexual needs of some subgroups of people with intellectual disabilities received scarce attention. Those support staff and relatives holding rather restrictive attitudes appear to emphasize sexual risks. Finally, support staff and relatives stressed the importance of providing sex education and support for people with intellectual disabilities, while, simultaneously, expressing insecurity over the subject. The findings can help to improve the support provided to support staff and relatives to promote sexual health among people with intellectual disabilities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.