2020
DOI: 10.1134/s1063776120010173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aluminum–Carbon Interaction at the Aluminum–Graphene and Aluminum–Graphite Interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the calculated Laplace pressure and the interface radius, we estimated the surface tension γ = 0.39 J/m 2 . This value is higher than the surface tension of the interface between aluminum and graphite, reported in our previous paper [44].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using the calculated Laplace pressure and the interface radius, we estimated the surface tension γ = 0.39 J/m 2 . This value is higher than the surface tension of the interface between aluminum and graphite, reported in our previous paper [44].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The surface tension calculated with formula (5) is γ = 0.39 J/m 2 . We estimated the surface tension aluminum with the same EAM potential in our previous paper [44]. At 1000 K, the result was 0.71 J/m 2 , which is higher by 0.32 J/m 2 than the value of γ from the current study.…”
Section: Capillary Phenomena At the Interface Between Molten Aluminum...supporting
confidence: 42%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The embedded atom model (EAM) was used for Al–Al interactions, which accurately reproduces the phonon dispersion of aluminum (Al) . For Al–graphene interactions, we employed the Morse potential, which was designed for sp 2 -carbon modeled by Tersoff and Al modeled by the EAM …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%