1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00308241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aluminous goethite: A m�ssbauer study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Al-goethite was crystalline with MCD 111 of ϳ24 nm. Aluminum substitution causes a reduction in crystallite size and unit cell dimensions (Norrish and Taylor, 1961;Thiel, 1963;Bigham et al, 1978;Fysh and Clark, 1982). The decrease in d 111 spacing and MCD 111 (Fig.…”
Section: Properties Of the Sediment Goethite Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Al-goethite was crystalline with MCD 111 of ϳ24 nm. Aluminum substitution causes a reduction in crystallite size and unit cell dimensions (Norrish and Taylor, 1961;Thiel, 1963;Bigham et al, 1978;Fysh and Clark, 1982). The decrease in d 111 spacing and MCD 111 (Fig.…”
Section: Properties Of the Sediment Goethite Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lowering the measurement temperature reduces relaxation ef- 2919 Bacterial reduction of Al-goethite fects. Fysh and Clark (1982) proposed that the relaxation effects for Al-goethite were negligible at 4.2 K. Murad and Schwertmann (1983), in contrast, argued that the particle size effects were not completely removed at 4.2 K. Both Fysh and Clark, and Murad and Schwertmann proposed equations to calculate the Al content of synthetic Al-goethites from spectra collected at 4.2 K. Murad and Schwertmann further suggested that crystallinity information (surface area or MCD) data were essential for the calculation of Al content.…”
Section: Properties Of the Sediment Goethite Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It accounts for 34% of the total spectral area, and is most likely due to hematite. Its hyperfine field is too large to be due to goethite (H3o0.K = 383 kOe, Fysh and Clark, 1982a), and the negative quadrupole splitting eliminates the possibility of maghemite (H300,~ = 500 kOe, A = +0.01 mm/sec, Longworth and Tite, 1977). The hyperfine field of hematite at 300~ is 517 kOe, and its quadrupole splitting is -0.21 mm/sec (Fysh and Clark, 1982b of a decreased hyperfine field for hematite at 300~ have been discussed elsewhere .…”
Section: K Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known masses of the cleaned kaolin (sample K3) and pure goethite (U4.2OK = 0.69 + 0.02, Fysh and Clark, 1982a) of known Fe content were mixed, and the 4.2~ spectrum of this absorber is shown in Figure 5. The hyperfine splitting of the pure goethite is 505 kOe, so that the small spectral contribution arising from the surface iron could not be resolved from that of the goethite.…”
Section: Recoil-free Fraction Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%