2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7037(01)00656-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissimilatory bacterial reduction of Al-substituted goethite in subsurface sediments

Abstract: Abstract-The microbiologic reduction of a 0.2 to 2.0 m size fraction of an Atlantic coastal plain sediment (Eatontown) was investigated using a dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacterium (Shewanella putrefaciens, strain CN32) to evaluate mineralogic controls on the rate and extent of Fe(III) reduction and the resulting distribution of biogenic Fe(II). Mössbauer spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to show that the sedimentary Fe(III) oxide was Al-substituted goethite (13-17% Al) that existed as 1-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
76
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
76
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, mineralogy and surface area of the solids can not completely explain the variability in rates and extents of bioreduction of Fe(III) associated with the various Fe(III)-rich phases ( Figure 4A,B), especially as crystalline hematite was the predominant Fe(III) phase detected by XRD in all of these samples ( Figure 2). Substitutions of chemical species (notably Al) within mineral matrices may modulate the bioreducibility of Fe(III) phases [42,43], though the effect of Al substitution on bioreduction appears to vary, depending on the mineralogy of the Fe(III) phases [44]. However, after preliminary examination of the Fe(III) phases by Mössbauer spectrometry we were unable to detect evidence of differences in Al substitution (data not shown).…”
Section: Controls On Fe(iii) Bioreductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As a result, mineralogy and surface area of the solids can not completely explain the variability in rates and extents of bioreduction of Fe(III) associated with the various Fe(III)-rich phases ( Figure 4A,B), especially as crystalline hematite was the predominant Fe(III) phase detected by XRD in all of these samples ( Figure 2). Substitutions of chemical species (notably Al) within mineral matrices may modulate the bioreducibility of Fe(III) phases [42,43], though the effect of Al substitution on bioreduction appears to vary, depending on the mineralogy of the Fe(III) phases [44]. However, after preliminary examination of the Fe(III) phases by Mössbauer spectrometry we were unable to detect evidence of differences in Al substitution (data not shown).…”
Section: Controls On Fe(iii) Bioreductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Powder XRD patterns and Mössbauer measurements were obtained as described previously Kukkadapu et al 2001). The, JADE+, V5 (Materials Data, Inc., Livermore, California) data analysis software package was used to subtract the XRD spectra of the ammonium-oxalate treated sample from the spectra of the untreated sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulation of Al at the goethite surface during dissolution was thought to block the reactive surface sites, thus decreasing the rate of Fe release. In contrast, the reductive dissolution of a natural Al-goethite (x = 0.17) by Shewanella putrefaciens showed that dissolution was unaffected by Al sorption (Kukkadapu et al 2001). In this latter study, reductive dissolution was thought to occur at sites distant from those of Al precipitation or adsorption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Given the potential for Al substitution to influence the dissolution of goethite and other Fe(III) oxides, and thus the supply of bioavailable Fe(III), a growing body of work has explored the rates and mechanisms of dissolution for both natural and synthetic Al-substituted goethites (Cervini-Silva and Sposito 2002;Dominik et al 2002;Ekstrom et al 2010;Kukkadapu et al 2001;Maurice et al 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%