Alternative Trim Analysis Formulations for Vehicles with Redundant Multi-Axis Control Surfaces

Garmendia, Daniel C.; Mavris, Dimitri N.

doi:10.2514/6.2014-2058

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…not trim-only) is compared to other interesting trim solutions (in Figure 11) discovered during the previous study. 1 The Direct Allocation control allocation method had been integrated into the conventional trim optimization statement to choose the elevon deflections. The trim solution that met the throttle constraint resembled the behavior of split drag rudders.…”

Section: B Comparing Trim Results To Other Alternativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Power Efficient Trim Solutions for the Hybrid Wing Body in Approach Conditions

Garmendia

Mavris

2015

AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The presence of control redundancy in configurations such as the Hybrid Wing Body can result in non-unique trim trim solutions. This can be taken advantage of to minimize a secondary metric in addition to balancing the forces and moments acting on the vehicle. In a previous study, drag was investigated as a secondary metric and was found to work well for several flight conditions. For the approach flight condition, however, the minimum drag solution was found to require a thrust below an assumed approach idle throttle. A different metric must be used in the presence of an active throttle constraint during optimization. Actuation power requirements are known to be a subject of much uncertainty and high risk for the Hybrid Wing Body configuration. Trim solutions that help keep actuation power requirements low are therefore worth investigating. A metric based on control surface hinge moments was developed and used for trim optimization analyses. Under the assumption of electrical actuation systems, it can be used as a stand-in for steady state power in early design phases. The metric was successfully used to identify trim solutions that will likely have low steady state power requirements. The optimizer was able to achieve low power trim solutions by allowing several elevons to float to their neutral hinge moment positions, while using a single pair of elevons to trim the remaining pitching moments. The sensitivity of the minimum power trim solution to deflection limits and the use of trim-only devices was also investigated.

show abstract

Section: B Comparing Trim Results To Other Alternativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 Unique and optimal trim solutions could be arrived at reliably with gradient optimizers and with far fewer initial condition trials as the conventional approach. During an approach flight condition, however, the HWB configuration may be too clean and can run into minimum throttle issues.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%