Alternative Scenarios for The Quasi-Judicial Administration to Provide Access to Justice under Public Health Emergencies

Abstract

Public health emergency has had a significant impact, especially in the administration of quasi-judicial institutions in Indonesia. Due to Covid-19, which requires social restrictions, it will impact the process of examining various lawsuits that have been registered. Policies to respond to health emergencies should be developed so as not to reduce access to justice. This research is normative methods. The object of this research is the policy of a quasi-judicial agency in a public health emergency condition. The Indonesian Central Information Commission is the object of the analysis research unit and becomes main focused on what policy to resolve, how to organize and implement them. The research results show that the implementation of duties and functions can be done by issuing or revising procedural law arrangements in an emergency. Regulations can be made by self-regulation, considering that the Indonesian information commission is a self-regulating body. The exercise of authority can be carried out by using the information system by conducting electronic checks, except in some instances, it can be held by standard procedure.

Digitalization of Evidence in the Constitutional Court: Opportunities and Requisite

“…8 However, what distinguishes it from the United States Supreme Court, the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia is regulated textually and concretely in the 1945 Constitution. 9 The powers of the Constitutional Court under the 1945 Constitution are to examine the unconstitutional provisions of laws, adjudicate disputes concerning the powers of state organs empowered by the Constitution, adjudicate the dissolution of political parties, and resolve disputes over the results of general elections. 10 In exercising its authority to hear cases, the Constitutional Court has provisions in the proceedings or it can be called the Procedural Law of the Constitutional Court.…”